Frenkel Topping and NAHL call off takeover talks


Stock exchange: Deal presented commercial and integration difficulties

Talks about a reverse takeover of NAHL Group – the owner of National Accident Helpline – by fellow AIM-listed company Frenkel Topping have been called off.

The potential offer was first revealed in September but the date by which Frenkel Topping had to declare its decision was extended three times, until yesterday it announced that it has concluded not to make a firm offer, with the pair agreeing to terminate discussions.

Frenkel Topping had identified NAHL Group’s case manager and rehabilitation operation – which only accounts for a quarter of the group’s turnover – as its main target and said it could lead to the claims management business, associated law firm and conveyancing leads arm, responsible for the rest of the turnover, being sold off.

In a statement to the stock market yesterday, Frenkel Topping said: “Frenkel Topping and NAHL have engaged in constructive and open discussions and a period of mutual due diligence. It has however become apparent that a combination presents certain commercial and integration challenges.

“Therefore, the board of Frenkel Topping believes that other growth and acquisition opportunities are more compelling at this time and in the best interest of its shareholders.

“The board of Frenkel Topping recognises that this is a disappointing outcome but, as a significant shareholder in NAHL, also wishes NAHL the best for the future.”

The board of NAHL said it too “has been unable to conclude a transaction that is in the best interests of NAHL shareholders”.

In an accompanying business update, NAHL said it had ended the 2020 financial year in line with the board’s expectations.

“The group continues to deliver on its near-term strategic focus of producing positive cash flows and reducing net debt.

“Since the Group’s last update, net debt has reduced by a further £0.8m to £16.3m at 31 December 2020 (31 December 2019: £21m).

“Furthermore, the group is pleased to report free cash flow of £6.1m for the year, a significant improvement compared to the previous year (2019: cash outflow of £1.7m). This was achieved through placement optimisation, increased settlements from historical claims and improved cost savings.”

The statement added that the board remained “committed to creating value from the group’s portfolio and will continue to actively review its operations and strategy”.




Blog


Is your Google Ads budget funding your competitors’ AI visibility?

If your cost-per-click has crept up again this year, you’ve probably assumed the market simply got more expensive. That’s the wrong way to read what’s happening.


Containing the spread of unapproved AI

Nearly 60% of fee-earners admit to using unapproved tools (like free versions of ChatGPT). Yet 68% of firm leaders are confident there is zero risk of unapproved AI being used for client work.


When AI adoption goes wrong, costs add up fast

City AM recently reported that London is fighting to claim the title of ‘global capital of legal AI’. However, it’s crucial we remember that adoption alone does not create value.


Loading animation