Flexible working overtakes pay as top priority for job-seeking lawyers


Cormell: Either offer flexible working or pay very well

Flexible working has overtaken pay as the top priority for lawyers looking for a change of job, a survey has found.

At the same time, more than eight out of ten lawyers (83%) said job security was “not a concern” for them in 2021, compared to only a third last year, and most were not looking to move.

Realm Recruit, based in Cheshire, contacted 100 lawyers who were “loosely representative of the make-up of the legal profession as a whole”.

Just over a half said flexible working would be “very important” if they looked for a job over the coming months, compared to 41% who rated getting a pay rise as very important. The gap was notably bigger for Millennials.

Researchers commented: “Usually, when an individual knows that they want to move on from their current role, there will be one overriding reason behind wanting to leave, which in turn will be their top priority when looking for a new role.

“When looking for their next job, they will look for a position that provides, for example, better pay, a shorter commute or improved progression prospects.”

However, “for the very first time” flexibility had overtaken pay as the priority.

“It’s clear that flexible working is no longer considered by jobseekers to be a bonus − for most people, it’s a necessity.

“Law firms that are not willing to participate in the remote working revolution and offer flexible working options to their lawyers will find it increasingly difficult not only to attract but to retain staff.”

Notably, while half of respondents said their firms allowed them to work up to five days a week remotely, only 35% though they should allow so much. Some 62% said they ended up working more hours when at home.

Researchers said the increase in job security might just be solely a result of the reopening of the economy, but “it may also be the case that law firms have taken steps to look after and reassure their employees, after recognising the abundance of opportunities on offer elsewhere”.

Only half of lawyers said they felt their employers looked after them well, while 24% said the opposite; the rest were neutral.

On diversity, a narrow majority (55%) said their law firm’s leadership was “representative of the demographic of the firm as a whole”, while more than two-thirds said everyone at the firm had an equal opportunity to succeed.

Realm urged firms to “properly communicate” their proposition to prospective employees.

“Law firms should work to cultivate a strong employer brand and then showcase this in the careers section of their website, through PR activity, on social media and in job adverts.

“Firms that make these changes will be on the front foot when it comes to standing out to passive/inactive candidates, whereas those that fail to embrace flexibility or to pay their lawyers well enough risk missing out on the best people.”

Duane Cormell, managing director of Realm Recruit, said lawyers had realised that the traditional nine-to-five routine was not the only option.

“It is in the best interest of firms to address their flexible working policies, as our research shows the next biggest single factor firms can continue to meaningfully compete on is pay.

“What’s more, with just 20% of lawyers currently identifying as active jobseekers, law firms have to work harder than ever before to pique the interest of prospective employees.

“Firms must either offer flexible working options or pay their lawyers very well if they are successfully to attract, recruit and retain the best people for their business.”




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


A new route to practice rights for chartered legal executives

Following approval from the Legal Services Board in May 2022, CILEx Regulation has launched an alternative route for chartered legal executives to obtain independent practice rights.


NFTs, the courts and the role of injunctions

In May, news broke that a non-fungible token was the subject of a successful injunction made by the Singapore High Court. The NFT in question is part of the very valuable Bored Ape Yacht Club series.


Matthew Pascall

Low-value commercial cases – an achievable challenge for ATE insurers

There are many good claims brought for damages that are likely to be significantly less than twice the cost of bringing the claim. These cases present a real challenge for insurers.


Loading animation