Firms advising on insurance policies “must comply with EU directive”


Injury: ATE policies fall under directive

New rules implementing an EU directive that could affect the way personal injury solicitors, conveyancers and others advise clients on insurance policies have been approved by the Legal Services Board and Financial Conduct Authority.

The oversight regulators rubber-stamped regulations advanced by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to make changes consistent with the Insurance Distribution Directive (IDD), which replaces the Insurance Mediation Directive and deals with issues such as conflicts of interest and commissions.

Implementation into UK law was delayed and the new rules will now come into force on 1 October.

Changes were needed to rules governing the way firms carry on financial services. Firms affected will include those which sell, advise on, or conclude insurance contracts, such as after-the-event costs insurance in a personal injury matter, or insurance for a defective title in a conveyance.

Among other things, the IDD sets minimum hours for continuing professional development of staff involved in distributing insurance; a requirement for a complaints and redress process; an obligation to disclose any conflict information to clients; to act honestly, fairly and honestly; and so on.

The SRA advised: “All firms should therefore assess their own individual practices and make sure they are… able to comply with the revised rules.”

The regulator said it would be writing to “a number of firms” that indicated that they carry on insurance mediation activities in their responses to the 2017 financial services activities questionnaire.

Paul Philip, the SRA’s chief executive, said: “Our changes meet the requirements of the new directive without putting unnecessary burdens on firms. For example, in many areas our Code of Conduct already covers what is needed.

“It’s important that firms make sure they are up to date with the revised requirements, so that they can provide a proper service to their clients.”

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

11 November 2019

Taking a strategic approach to cyber-risk

If you forced 10 cyber-criminals to sit through an average law firm’s IT committee meeting, they’d be turning themselves in to the National Crime Agency before it reached AOB.

Read More

Loading animation