Firm sued over ground rent that doubles every five years


Mathuradas: Client left in a horrendous position

A West Midlands law firm is being sued by a client who claims it failed to tell of a “ridiculous” ground rent that doubles every five years – meaning she will be paying £1m a year in 50 years.

Complaints about inadequate advice on ground rent and other clauses in leases have been growing in recent times, increasing nervousness among professional indemnity insurers.

Carole Patterson bought a one-bedroom flat in East Dulwich, South London in 2011 for £170,000 as an investment and says FBC Manby Bowdler failed to tell her about the ground rent clause.

It rose to £525 in 2016 and £1,050 this year. In another 20 years, the ground rent will be £16,800 and over £1m in 50. In a century, it will be more than half a billion pounds a year.

Ms Patterson said “It is just ridiculous. It effectively means the flat is worthless as nobody would buy it now and there is also no way I can afford the ground rent in a few years’ time…

“What’s even more infuriating is that my flat is the only one in the block with this doubling of the ground rent clause. My solicitors at the time should have alerted me to this clause, but they didn’t…

“Unless the lease is amended, I will end up having to hand the keys to the freeholder as the ground rent will be too expensive for me to pay.”

The landlord has offered to change the terms of the lease for a payment of £100,000 – a quarter of the current value of the property.

London firm Osbornes Law is acting for Ms Patterson. Head of litigation Shilpa Mathuradas said: “Our client has been left in a horrendous position of not being able to sell her property while the ground rent doubles every five years to unaffordable proportions.

“We argue that this doubling of the ground rent clause was left in as a direct result of negligence on the part of the acting solicitors for failing to provide a service to a reasonable standard.”

In a statement, FBC Manby Bowdler said it could not comment on the specific case for reasons of client confidentiality, but that it always strove to offer a first-class service to all its clients.

“FBC Manby Bowdler is an award-winning law firm which places the highest importance on its responsibilities to its clients and adherence to the Solicitors’ Professional Code of Conduct.

“This is a complex area of law and something which raises broader issues which are now being addressed by Parliament.”




    Readers Comments

  • Nicholas Mills says:

    Is the claim not out of time?

  • The junior lawyer says:

    In these cases, the tort of negligence, a claimant has six years from that date when the claimant suffers a financial loss as a result of a negligent professional which in this case would have arguably been 2016. The secondary relevant limitation period is three years from the date of knowledge of the facts which might give rise to a claim. But there is a long stop date of fifteen years within which claims must be brought.

  • Nicholas Mills says:

    I think loss was when lease was entered into–landlord had the right to increase the ground rent making the lease worthless–no one who understood the terms of the lease re ground rent would enter into it–similar to case reported in News section where judge ruled a claim time barred .


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Are inheritance disputes set to become disputes with will-writers?

With one in four people saying they’d contest an inheritance if they didn’t feel it was distributed properly, many solicitors will have dealt with clients who are making a will that will subsequently be challenged.


If resigning is not enough…

Last week, I wrote about the Post Office scandal. I made clear my view that resigning is not enough, but some people have rightly challenged me to say what I feel would be enough.


Loading animation