Fines for solicitors who ran SDLT avoidance schemes


Seychelles: solicitors had business registered there

Two partners of a former Yorkshire law firm have been fined by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal for their involvement in stamp duty land tax (SDLT) avoidance schemes.

Richard Chan and Rajob Ali of Harrogate firm Abode Solicitors – which the Solicitors Regulation Authority shut down in October 2013 over accounts rules failures – were fined £15,000 each by the tribunal, which is at the higher end of the fines usually handed out.

It found that they had not acted in the best interests of their clients, not provided a proper standard of service, failed to act in a way that maintains the trust the public has in solicitors and the provision of legal services, failed to run their business effectively and failed to protect client money and assets.

The tribunal heard on how the pair operated various SDLT avoidance schemes for house buyers. They advised clients on the avoidance scheme through their own separate Seychelles-based business, which took a commission.

It found Mr Chan and Mr Ali liable for 20 breaches, which included failing to act in the best interests of clients, acting where there was a conflict or significant risk of conflict between clients, numerous accounts rules breaches and failing to comply with undertakings.

However, the tribunal decided the SRA did not prove Mr Chan and Mr Ali acted without integrity, nor that they allowed their independence to be compromised, nor that they acted in transactions which were dubious. As well as fining Mr Chan and Mr Ali £15,000, the tribunal ordered them to be jointly liable for costs, which have yet to be agreed.

The two solicitors have 21 days from the publication of the tribunal’s written judgment to appeal.

Last week Legal Futures reported on a regulatory settlement agreement the SRA struck with Surrey law firm Mundays over its involvement in SDLT avoidance schemes, although in that case they were not the firm’s own schemes.

Last year, then SRA chief executive Antony Townsend warned firms against seeing SDLT schemes “as an easy way to make some extra money”.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

No larger firm can ignore the demands of innovation – that was the clear message from our most recent roundtable: “The law firm of the future”, sponsored by LexisNexis Enterprise Solutions. It comes in many forms, predominantly but not just technology, and is not simply a case of automating process. Expertise and process are not mutually exclusive.

Blog

20 September 2018
Simon McCrum

Why don’t lawyers do what you ask them to do?

Having been team leader, department head, division head and managing partner, I understand well the frustration (and anger) that managing partners and CEOs voice to me: “We’ve asked them a dozen times, but still they aren’t doing what we need!”

Read More