Fines for solicitor who misused client account and COFA who let him

SRA: Inherently objectionable to use client account this way

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has handed substantial fines to a director who used his firm’s client account as a banking facility and the compliance officer who allowed it.

The £9,000 fines for Martyn Green and Michael Ward, the two directors of Burd Ward on the Wirral, are the latest example of the regulator flexing its increased fining power to sanction solicitors up to £25,000.

SRA notices recorded that Mr Green acted on behalf of a client in relation to a commercial property dispute. The parties to the dispute had operated a business account to collect income and pay outgoings relating to the property. The joint account was frozen due to contested withdrawals.

Mr Green arranged for the parties to use the firm’s client account instead to collect rental income and pay outgoings for two years, in breach of the rule against using it as a banking facility. He was not motivated by financial gain in doing so, the SRA acknowledged.

In setting the level of fine, the SRA said using a client account this way was “inherently objectionable, regardless of impact or harm”.

It explained: “This type of misconduct carries associated risks, including facilitating money laundering, avoiding obligations in an insolvency situation, and improperly hiding assets.”

The SRA noted that Mr Green was an experienced solicitor, while the situation continued for several months after it first raised concerns. He also “showed a lack of insight into the potential consequences of the misconduct during the investigation”.

In mitigation, the regulator took account of Mr Green’s “unblemished” regulatory history, his co-operation with the investigation. the absence of any evidence of a pattern of misconduct and “an expression of apology for the time that the SRA had been put to”.

Mr Ward, meanwhile, holds all the compliance roles at the firm. The SRA said he was “aware of and approved this arrangement despite his responsibilities as director and COFA of the firm to ensure that the firm’s conduct adhered to the SRA regulatory regime”.

The same aggravating and mitigating factors applied in his case as Mr Green’s and he too was fined £9,000.

    Readers Comments

  • derek durbridge says:

    The SRA are being too lenient on corrupt solicitors, they should be disbarred, too many excuses given and accepted by the SRA, I suppose the illegal immigration lawyers named and shamed will still be allowed to practice after robbing the British taxpayers.Corruption must be rooted out immediately, police,drs etc lose their jobs immediately,what makes the legal profession superior to the boot.???

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Retrospective or not retrospective, that is the question

As the debate heats up over the Litigation Funding Agreements (Enforceability) Bill, it is crucial to understand what is the true vice in retrospective legislation.

Harnessing the balance of technology and human interaction

In today’s legal landscape, finding the delicate balance between driving efficiency via use of technology and providing a personalised service is paramount to success.

AI’s legal leap: transforming law practice with intelligent tech

Just like in numerous other industries, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in the legal sector is proving to be a game-changer.

Loading animation