Family lawyer convicted over offensive text to ex-partner


Conviction: Single text

A family law specialist convicted of sending a malicious communication to his ex-partner has been rebuked by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

Matthew Miles, an associate at Silk Family Law in Newcastle, accepted the sanction in a regulatory settlement agreement.

He pleaded guilty to sending an offensive text message at Harrogate Magistrates’ Court a year ago and was fined £1,269, and also ordered to pay a surcharge of £127 and costs of £85.

He admitted that he had failed to uphold public trust and confidence in the profession

In mitigation, Mr Miles pointed out that he pleaded guilty and cooperated with both the police and SRA investigations. Further, he has “expressed insight and remorse into his offending, such that the risk of re-offending appears low”.

The SRA said a rebuke was the appropriate outcome because “a sanction is required to uphold public confidence in the delivery of legal services”, while a lesser sanction “would not sufficiently address the nature of the criminal offence”.

Silk Family Law was acquired by Irwin Mitchell last year.




Blog


The AI question law firms should answer before a client asks it

Most law firms we speak to are already using AI, whether or not they have approved it, because fee-earners are doing it anyway. The tool people settle on is often Claude.


From chat to Cowork: preparing your law firm for agentic AI

AI is evolving quickly. For law firms still working out how to get consistent value from the tools they already have, the conversation has moved on again to agentic AI.


Why good governance matters when managing Law Society forms

Everyday legal transactions rely on Law Society forms. But they are often treated as static templates rather than what they really are: living documents that change over time.


Loading animation