Family law solicitor opts for “quick and transparent” BSB entity regulation


Lewis: BSB entities suited to low-risk sole practitioners

A high-profile family law solicitor has set up a Bar Standards Board-regulated (BSB) entity because the regulation it offered was, she said, an “easy fit” for her low-risk sole practice.

Oxford-based Alexandra Lewis Family Law Limited received BSB authorisation at the end of last month.

Ms Lewis, who is a trained mediator, was a partner at top family practice Manches (now Penningtons Manches) for more than 10 years. Since 2011 she has worked remotely as a consultant with London-based niche family law firm Moss Fallon.

She told Legal Futures that the decision to seek BSB regulation was because she understood it to suit sole practitioners like herself: “I’m not planning to employ anyone and I had heard that it was a quick and more transparent way to get set up quickly, and that was my experience.”

Ms Lewis said she wanted to have her own practice, because being a consultant  involved fee splitting, and “additional regulations and hoops to jump”.

She continued: “I’m someone who settles cases quickly. I do litigate but I think the job of a solicitor is to settle – get in, get out.

“I also don’t think that the model of being a partner in a big firm with assistants benefits the clients because it duplicates costs… I would rather just work direct for clients that suit me…

“If you are litigating and you’ve got… [many] court bundles to prepare and there are lots of satellite issues, then there are some advantages to being in a big firm. But most of my caseload, historically, has involved thin files and I’m focused on settlement.”

Ms Lewis said she had much in common with barrister sole practitioners who presented a low risk and were therefore “safe” from the regulator’s perspective.

“As I understand it, the BSB’s idea of single-person entities is designed for people exactly like me; people who are independent, do not work in a large organisation, who have an established track record, and have an established professional profile that they can rely upon.

“I am – touch wood – low risk. I know what I’m doing.”

She added that she did not handle client funds and that part of setting up the BSB entity involved incorporating the business. “I had to set up a company which is another security for them, I guess, because you have certain requirements and regulations as a company director.”

She concluded: “[Becoming BSB regulated] was a good and easy fit.”

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

26 February 2020

Law schools, the SQE and technology

Many legal education providers are grappling with how to respond to the SQE. One thing that is clear is that courses will need to offer exposure to, and the use of, technology.

Read More

Loading animation