F4L unveils referral fee-compliant ‘pay per enquiry’ model


Anwar: Prudent to be ready now

Marketing collective First4Lawyers has unveiled a new lead generation model that it says allows firms to pay a fee per enquiry while complying with the referral fee ban.

It said the new approach acknowledged that the value of road traffic accident claims for firms would be “greatly reduced or even removed completely” because of next year’s Civil Liability Act reforms.

It will operate alongside First4Lawyers’ existing panel scheme, under which firms pay a flat monthly marketing fee and receive a fluctuating number of enquiries on a month-by-month basis.

The two models will run alongside each other while the timeline for implementation of the Civil Liability Act reforms remains uncertain, enabling law firms to decide which one is best suited to their own business.

While, under the new scheme, First4Lawyers will still screen the viability of new enquiries and decide whether to transfer the call to a panel law firm, the caller will be notified that they have to provide the same relevant information to the law firm as there will be no data transferred.

First4Lawyers said legal advice suggested that not transferring data was “the only way that a ‘fee per enquiry’ model can be considered to comply with the LASPO ban on law firms paying a referral fee”.

Section 56(5) of LASPO says there is a referral if one person provides another with “information that a provider of legal services would need to make an offer to the client” to provide personal injury legal services.

Though there is widespread doubt that the reforms will come into force in April 2020 as planned, First4Lawyers said it was rolling out its alternative structure now “so that firms can be prepared for when they are implemented”. It is also consulting with panel firms more broadly to plan for the post-reform period.

Managing director Qamar Anwar said: “One thing next year’s reforms will not do is stop people being injured. Access to justice is core to our work and we want to ensure that consumers can continue to find lawyers to represent them.

“We are confident in our ability to deliver what legal practices need and First4Lawyers has always adapted to changes in the market in a way that helps the law firms we work with.

“We recognise how difficult the reforms will make life for many personal injury firms and are committed to working with them to ensure their practices remain viable.

“That means adopting a flexible approach to meet the needs of our panel members and in the first instance, a new, alternative model, that means all of the risk will now rest with F4L. Despite the doubts surrounding the date of implementation, we believe it is prudent for firms and for us to be ready now.”




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

16 January 2020

Making Tax Digital throws spotlight on outdated legal IT systems

The first year of Making Tax Digital for VAT, known as the soft landing period, ends this April. During these first 12 months, firms without a compliant legal accounts package have used bridging software.

Read More

Loading animation