F1 NED – accident management boss convicted in ‘crash for number plate’ scam

Print This Post

5 January 2018


Bristol: Number plate owner had never been there

The director of an accident claims company has been fined for inventing a crash in order to trace the owner of a private number plate he wanted to buy.

Miles Savory, 40, a director of Bristol-based Accident Claims Handlers (ACH), sent official forms to the DVLA requesting the identity of the registered keeper of a 4×4 which he claimed had been involved in a collision in the city.

The owner of the 4×4 subsequently received a letter at his home from Mr Savory, offering to buy his private registration plate, W1 DOW. He complained to the DVLA and an internal investigation revealed that Mr Savory had used subterfuge in order to obtain his name and address.

The owner of the plate lived in Huddersfield and said he had never been to Bristol in his life. Police cameras confirmed the vehicle was not in the area at the time of the alleged crash. The DVLA reported the matter to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO).

Mr Savory admitted a charge of breaching section 55 of the Data Protection Act 1998 by unlawfully obtaining personal data when he appeared at Bristol Magistrates’ Court.

He was fined £335 and was ordered to pay £364 costs and a victim surcharge of £33.

ICO head of enforcement Steve Eckersley said: “This was an unusual case in many ways, but one which demonstrates the lengths some people will go to in order to get hold of personal information.

“Unlawfully obtaining people’s personal data is a criminal offence and the ICO will not hesitate to take action through the courts to uphold the law and protect people’s rights.”

ACH used to be a regulated claims management company but surrendered its licence in 2015.



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

How best to achieve independent regulation under the Legal Services Act?

Craig Wakeford LSB

Independent regulation gives confidence to consumers, providers, investors and society as a whole that legal services work in the public interest and support the rule of law. The Legal Services Act 2007 does not require all approved regulators to be structurally separate from representative bodies. Instead, the Legal Services Board is required by the Act to produce internal governance rules (IGR) which apply the principle of regulatory independence in legal service regulation. We are currently running a consultation on the IGR which continues until 9 February.

January 19th, 2018