F1 NED – accident management boss convicted in ‘crash for number plate’ scam


Bristol: Number plate owner had never been there

The director of an accident claims company has been fined for inventing a crash in order to trace the owner of a private number plate he wanted to buy.

Miles Savory, 40, a director of Bristol-based Accident Claims Handlers (ACH), sent official forms to the DVLA requesting the identity of the registered keeper of a 4×4 which he claimed had been involved in a collision in the city.

The owner of the 4×4 subsequently received a letter at his home from Mr Savory, offering to buy his private registration plate, W1 DOW. He complained to the DVLA and an internal investigation revealed that Mr Savory had used subterfuge in order to obtain his name and address.

The owner of the plate lived in Huddersfield and said he had never been to Bristol in his life. Police cameras confirmed the vehicle was not in the area at the time of the alleged crash. The DVLA reported the matter to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO).

Mr Savory admitted a charge of breaching section 55 of the Data Protection Act 1998 by unlawfully obtaining personal data when he appeared at Bristol Magistrates’ Court.

He was fined £335 and was ordered to pay £364 costs and a victim surcharge of £33.

ICO head of enforcement Steve Eckersley said: “This was an unusual case in many ways, but one which demonstrates the lengths some people will go to in order to get hold of personal information.

“Unlawfully obtaining people’s personal data is a criminal offence and the ICO will not hesitate to take action through the courts to uphold the law and protect people’s rights.”

ACH used to be a regulated claims management company but surrendered its licence in 2015.




Blog


Judging proportionate risk requires confidence. Do law firms have it?

As of 30 June 2026, the money laundering regulations have been updated again, this time to make the regime more proportionate and addressing unnecessary over-compliance.


Is clients’ use of AI destroying legal privilege?

Much has been written about the risks of lawyers misusing AI. However, in my view, the greater challenge lies elsewhere: the routine use of AI by clients themselves.


Does the Lloyd review mark the end of the Legal Services Act?

The Legal Services Board often generates eye-rolls and irritation from the leaders of the frontline regulators it oversees and of the representative bodies attached to them.


Loading animation