Exclusive: Law Society scraps external adjudication for freedom of information disputes

Print This Post

5 April 2017

Law Society: no requirement to respond to FoI requests

The Law Society has scrapped external freedom of information (FoI) adjudications in favour of reviews by an “independent member of staff” based at Chancery Lane, it has emerged.

The society is not a public body subject to the Freedom of Information Act, but its previous code aimed to ensure that the society and the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) responded to FoI requests as if they were covered by the Act, which meant having an independent reviewer akin to the Information Commissioner.

FoI adjudications by the society’s external adjudicator, Adam Sowerbutts, were posted on the society’s website and sometimes contained criticisms of both the society and the SRA.

In its new FoI code, adopted last month, the society said that anyone unhappy with its response to a request could have their concerns reviewed by a “more senior and independent member of staff” at Chancery Lane.

The code states: “By independent, we mean someone who has not been previously involved in your request.

“This person may need to contact you to confirm the nature of your concern. Once they have done so, they will contact you within 20 working days and let you know what will happen.

“The decision of the independent reviewer is final and there is no further avenue for appeal. It is also important for you to note that as this is a voluntary code, the Information Commissioner is unable to consider your complaint.”

Mr Sowerbutts, the society’s former FoI adjudicator, is a solicitor and, according to the society’s Find a Solicitor website, an employee at the Information Commissioner’s Office in Cheshire.

HIs two-year contract with Law Society, seen by Legal Futures, came to an end last month. Mr Sowerbutts was paid £1,000 per referral where no more than 7.5 hours were required for him to make a determination, and a further £100 per hour if the case was complex and needed more time.

A Law Society spokesman said: “On 24 March, the Law Society of England and Wales launched its new information code of practice. The previous version had been in place since 2005 and predated the creation of the SRA.

“Our new code no longer covers regulatory issues as they are now part of the remit of the SRA which has developed its own code.

“There is no requirement for the Law Society to respond to FoI requests as it is not a designated public authority under the Freedom of Information Act. However, we believe in being open and accountable.”

The SRA, which has been handling its own FoI requests since the beginning of 2016, introduced its separate FoI code in January this year.

Under the code, those unhappy with their decisions can ask the SRA’s information compliance team for a review, which the SRA aims to carry out within 20 days.

People unhappy with their reviews can make a further complaint to the SRA’s complaints team, and if they are still unhappy can take their complaint to the organisation’s independent reviewer, the Ombudsman Service, based in Warrington.

A spokesman for the SRA said the regulator wanted to introduce a “better and more effective” way of dealing with FoI requests, and said reviews would examine whether the proper procedures had been followed rather than the decision itself.

Like the Law Society, the SRA is not a public body for the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act.

2 Responses to “Exclusive: Law Society scraps external adjudication for freedom of information disputes”

  1. These are backwards steps, especially as regards the SRA (although the adjudication process was very unsatisfactory). The SRA ought to be brought under the FOI Act as it performs public functions.

  2. Anonymous on April 5th, 2017 at 6:55 am
  3. The abolition of adjudications is not consistent with the regulatory objectives. There is now no way of challenging a refusal to disclose information. This should be of serious concern to the profession and the public.

    If the SRA bars the public and press from its board meeting and then scraps FOI adjudications, how is anyone to hold it to account?

  4. Anon on April 5th, 2017 at 12:28 pm

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

‘No, minister – CMCs are not the answer to your problem’

Qamar Anwar 2

Last month, MPs on the justice select committee asked minister Lord Keen what would happen when the government went ahead with its plan to raise the small claims limit for personal injury claims (from £1,000 to £5,000 for road traffic related claims and to £2,000 for everything else). As it is a jurisdiction in which lawyers do not generally operate – because legal costs are not recoverable – who might help claimants navigate what can still be a complex process? His answer, surprisingly, was claims management companies.

February 22nd, 2018