Ex-MP convicted of perverting justice struck off as solicitor


Onasanya: Maintains innocence

Former Labour MP Fiona Onasanya has been struck off following her conviction for perverting the course of justice by lying about a speeding offence.

Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) president Ed Nally, chairing the panel, said: “As a parliamentarian makes the law so a solicitor must uphold the law and rule of law and sadly in this case Ms Onasanya has failed in those duties.”

In January, the ex-Peterborough MP was sentenced to three months in prison and failed in an appeal. She was recalled by her constituents and a by-election held recently to replace her.

She plotted with her brother Festus to avoid prosecution for speeding by naming Aleks Antipow as the driver of the Nissan Micra. Mr Antipow, Festus’s former lodger, was at home with his parents in Russia at the time. Festus was jailed for 10 months.

Ms Onasayna served 28 days in HMP Bronzefield, Surrey, the largest women’s prison in Europe.

Nimi Bruce, for the Solicitors Regulation Authority, told the tribunal: “The court found by 2 November 17 the respondent was aware that false information had been provided to the police by her brother.

“Ordinary, decent people would consider the behaviour giving rise to the conviction dishonest.”

Ms Onasanya, who represented herself before the SDT, insisted that she was innocent and said she was pursuing her case through the Criminal Cases Review Commission.

But the SDT found that she had failed to uphold the proper administration of justice, failed to act with integrity, behaved in a way likely to undermine public trust in the profession and by reason of her conviction acted dishonestly.

Mr Nally said the tribunal was aware that the conviction “has led to disastrous consequences both personally and professionally and [we] take full account of those”.

But he continued: “As a solicitor there are professional consequences which follow from a proven act of dishonesty.

“As a parliamentarian makes the law so a solicitor must uphold the law and rule of law and sadly in this case Ms Onasanya has failed in those duties.

“We believe that we have not heard anything that would amount to exceptional reasons that would prevent us from administering the ultimate sanction. We must strike off Ms Onasanya from the roll of solicitors.”

Sentencing her at the Old Bailey, Mr Justice Stuart-Smith repeatedly referred to Ms Onasanya’s role as a solicitor – she was previously a commercial property specialist.

“The fact remains that, both as a solicitor and as a Member of Parliament you are fully aware of the importance of upholding the proper administration of justice.

“You have not simply let yourself down; you have let down those who look to you for inspiration, your party, your profession and Parliament.”

Stuart-Smith J said he would not treat Ms Onasanya “more severely” because of her position as an MP and solicitor, but “there cannot be one law for those in positions of power, privilege and responsibility and another for those who are not”.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


The power of participation for trainees and apprentices

It’s important as a trainee or an apprentice to get involved in the life of your firm – even under the pressure of discovering how to navigate professional life and now the demands of the SQE.


Is it time to change how law firms view compliance?

Although COFAs often hold senior positions and play an essential role in a firm’s financial and regulatory integrity, the perception of the compliance function itself is still evolving.


From templates to culture change: Lessons from the SRA on source of funds

The SRA’s new thematic review into source of funds and wealth reveals both progress and persistent blind spots, with source-of-funds checks too often thought of as a procedural hurdle.


Loading animation