Ex-Linklaters employee banned for “serious sexual misconduct”


Linklaters: Events followed team away day

A former employee of Linklaters has been made subject to controls on his future employment in the profession over “serious sexual misconduct” targeted at a junior colleague.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has issued a section 43 order against Vivek Ramsaroop, whose last known address was in Johannesburg, South Africa.

As a result, he cannot work for a law firm in England and Wales without the regulator’s consent.

An SRA notice published yesterday that the events in question took place at a firm-organised social event in November 2022. Following an offsite team event, dinner and drinks, a number of attendees, including Mr Ramsaroop and ‘Employee A’ went to a karaoke bar.

“Whilst at the karaoke bar Mr Ramsaroop approached Employee A and stood closely to her talking and said the words ‘you’re gorgeous’ and ‘you’re amazing’. He then put his arm around Employee A’s waist and kissed the side of her face making contact with her cheek for several seconds.

“Shortly afterwards Mr Ramsaroop started dancing directly behind Employee A, grabbed her waist with both hands and touched her bottom. Mr Ramsaroop started rubbing himself against Employee A on the dancefloor with his pelvis pressed against Employee A’s bottom.”

This constituted “serious sexual misconduct” as defined by the SRA’s guidance on sexual misconduct “as it involved physical contact and intentional actions which were repeated and which were directed at a junior colleague”.

Mr Ramsaroop was also ordered to pay a proportion of the SRA’s costs of £1,350.




Blog


Beyond the PII premium – rethinking risk

Professional indemnity insurance renewal is often treated as an annual pricing exercise. But it is also a chance to show how effectively you identify, manage and mitigate risk.


The AI governance gap in law firms and why it matters now

A third of law firms are already using AI tools with no formal policy in place to govern how AI gets used, what data goes into it, or who’s accountable when something goes wrong.


Information isn’t oversight – lessons from the PM Law review

The PM Law review’s real findings perhaps point to a failure mode applying to any organisation sitting on scattered risk information.


Loading animation