Ex-FBI cyber chief warns lawyers over corporate espionage


Waisberg (right) and Wildisen: combining AI products can increase impact

Basic digital housekeeping like keeping software up-to-date and backing up data separately from your network will solve most cyber-security issues – with corporate espionage one issue law firms have to face – according to a former assistant director of the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).

Speaking at Tuesday’s Legal Geek conference in London, John Boles, who directed the FBI’s global cyber operations and investigations during his 21-year career with the agency, said the cyber threat was real and “as bad as everybody says”.

He reported that during his time at the FBI, in the US alone there were over 6,000 active cases of cyber attack at any given time, ranging from ransomware and malware, to DDOS (denial of service). But these were “only the tip of the iceberg”, he said, because most attacks went unreported.

He said law firms were susceptible to attempted corporate espionage, especially if they were involved in “antagonistic cases”. He added: “It’s not uncommon for folks to be trying to find out what the other side’s thinking”.

But he said that much of the cyber-security battle could be won if firms “do the basics”. This included updating and regularly implementing software ‘patches’ provided by the vendor – aimed at removing security vulnerabilities.

Also, since ransomware attacks often targeted network-connected devices for encryption until a ransom was paid to unencrypt them, it was common sense to keep back-ups separate, he said. Firms should also keep passwords secure and ask themselves “does everyone in [the] company need to have access?”

Everyday software added to networks sometimes “shipped with security settings set to low or zero”, which needed customising on installation, he warned.

Mr Boles concluded: “The bad guys are out there and are thinking how can they monetise your data quicker than you can… Nobody loves your data like you love your data. It’s your crown jewels.”

Meanwhile, also at the conference, Noah Waisberg and Greg Wildisen, respectively the chief executive and international managing director of artificial intelligence (AI) software providers Kira Systems and Neota Logic, which are used by legal firms around the world to process documents and data, gave a joint presentation.

The pair described a phenomenon called ‘bricolage’, which is the use of more than one AI system in sequence to create a more powerful data refinement tool.

Mr Waisberg gave the example of a collaboration between three legal tech companies, Neota, Kira and data-sharing platform HighQ by Australian-based law firm, Allen. The three companies collaborated to create an AI application known as REDDA (Real Estate Due Diligence App) to analyse huge lease portfolios and flag areas for further review.

Mr Wildisen described bricolage as “taking tech

  • A deep dive into the new world of fixed recoverable costs

  • Accounts Rules Update including recent amendments

  • Adoption law and placement ordersComing soon

  • All you need to know when advising clients on making gifts – overcoming pitfalls and problems

  • AML update, including new sectoral reviews and warning notices

  • An overview of the Building Safety Act 2022Coming soon

  • Bare trusts and the TRS

  • Build over agreements, septic tanks and lateral drains

  • Bullet proof your will files – a practical guide to stopping probate disputes

  • Certificates of TitleComing soon

  • CGT and residential property

  • Challenging the exercise of dispositive powers in trusts

  • Changes to income tax treatment of low income estates and trusts for 2024/2025

  • Children and family law spring 2024

  • Claims Futures Conference 2024

  • Client care: costs, conflicts, and confidentialityComing soon

  • Client reporting for property lawyers

  • Cohabitation: latest developmentsComing soon

  • COLP update 2023

  • Commercial property (including landlord and tenant) Autumn update 2023

  • Commercial property (including landlord and tenant) update April 2024Coming soon

  • Commercial property (including landlord and tenant) update February 2024

  • Commercial property (including landlord and tenant) update Spring 2023

  • Commercial property (including landlord and tenant) update Summer 2023

  • Commercial property Winter 2023 – latest developments and the tricky issues of insurance in commercial leases

  • Completions: are you missing and/or overlooking issues?

  • Compliance update no 1, 2023

  • Compliance update no 2, 2023

  • Conducting advocacy in children and injunction cases

  • Consumer law – the key changes you need to know about

  • Contract formation – beware the pitfalls

  • Contract formation, implied terms, good faith and exclusion clauses

  • Costs challenges after Belsner

  • CQS Practice Management Standards

  • Cybercrime – problems, solutions and how to minimise risk

  • Defamation – meaning, serious harm, defences and remedies

  • Defining the retainer: terms of business letter

  • Developments in secure accommodation and deprivation of liberty cases surrounding children and young persons 2022

  • Difficult break clauses and how to get them to work

  • Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers BillComing soon

  • Discrimination – remedies in employment tribunalsComing soon

  • Domestic Abuse Act 2021 – an updateComing soon

  • Domestic Abuse Act 2021 – key developments and what has changed

  • Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023Coming soon

  • Electronic signatures and witnessing – key recent developments

  • Enforcement of child arrangements orders

  • Enforcing lease covenants against former tenants and their guarantors

  • Entitlements of spouse and issue under intestacy

  • Establishing the deceased’s domicile

  • EU Succession Regulation – developments affecting British nationals resident in the EU

  • Family Investment Companies – when to use instead of or alongside a trust

  • Family law and practice for new entrants

  • Family law: case law, statute and practice guidance roundup for 2023

  • Financial remedies, cohabitation and marital breakdown

  • Fixed costs: time to get ready

  • Fixed recoverable costs 6 months in

  • Forfeiture for non-payment of rent

  • Getting your retainer right in a fixed costs world

  • Gifts of houses, or an interest in a house, in wills

  • Gifts with Reservation of Benefit – how to get the best for your clientComing soon

  • Guidance in running cohabitation cases

  • Highway and drainage issues in development projects

  • Holiday pay – rolled up pay, commission, overtime and back pay

  • Housing Condition Conference 2024

  • How and why cases can be dismissed without reaching trial

  • How much is the employment tribunal claim worth?

  • How to avoid Part 36 mishaps

  • Identifying personal injury claims in employment cases

  • Improving lease terms on renewal – what are the courts doing now?

  • Introduction to commercial leases

  • Introduction to forward funding

  • Introduction to rent review in commercial leases

  • Lease expiry and fixtures – should they stay or should they go?

  • Lease termination by business tenants – navigating the mazeComing soon

  • Leasehold update 2023

  • Leasehold update 2024

  • Listed buildings – issues for conveyancers

  • MLRO/MLCO – roles refined

  • Modification and discharge of restrictive covenants – an update

  • Multiple Dwellings Relief for SDLT – HMRC gets tough

  • New UKFIU SARs portal launches

  • Notice provisions and breach of warranty claims – traps for the unwary

  • Nuptial agreements and inheritances

  • Opposition to lease renewal for redevelopment – 5 top tips each for landlord and tenant

  • Parking rights – current position and practical issues

  • Part 36 decisions in 2023

  • Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954

  • Partnership and LLP Law – what every Partner and Member should knowComing soon

  • PI Futures 2024

  • Pilot trusts – problems and practicalities

  • Planning and building regulations – the key points

  • Practice and procedure in the employment tribunals

  • Preparing your client for tax year end – what they need to do now. Changes coming from 6th April

  • Progress in private children law 2023

  • Progress in public children law 2023

  • Proprietary estoppel claims

  • Protecting clients’ assets from the cost of care

  • QOCS – all change 6th April – what you must know

  • Recent changes in property development February 2024

  • Recent changes in property development October 2023

  • Recent changes in property development Spring 2023

  • Recent changes in property development Summer 2023

  • Recovery of possession from squatters

  • Recurring litigation nightmares

  • Redundancy: consultation, selection and ‘fire and rehire’Coming soon

  • Reporting to clients – key issues and lessons from cases

  • Reporting to lenders – know your obligationsComing soon

  • Residential property practice update December 2023

  • Residential property practice update February 2024

  • Residential property practice update May 2023

  • Residential property practice update September 2023

  • Retirement and removal of trusteesComing soon

  • Roundup of recent cases in wills and probate

  • Roundup of recent developments in the Court of Protection

  • Running divorce and other relationship breakdown applications

  • Running domestic abuse law cases

  • Safeguarding children’s futures – wills, trusts, and parents’ wishesComing soon

  • Sanctions, SRA guidance and counter-proliferation financing

  • Secure accommodation and deprivation cases involving children

  • Service charges – common issues and the RICS professional statement

  • Sole director companies – tips to avoid probate problems

  • SRA Accounts Rules three years on – change, clarity and integrity

  • Sub-sale agreements – issues to consider

  • Tax investigations

  • Telecoms update

  • The big CPR decisions of 2023

  • The latest developments in costs and fundingComing soon

  • The new regime of fixed recoverable costs: how to make it work for you

  • The new shared ownership model lease

  • The rules for reporting CGT disposals of UK residential property

  • Time recording – why is it so important?

  • Tricky issues with sub-leases – problems and practical solutionsComing soon

  • Trust corporations – pros and cons

  • Trust developments in 2023

  • Trusts and the RNRBComing soon

  • Turnover rents – the new normal for the High Street

  • UK GDPR – basic principles

  • UK GDPR – direct marketing

  • UK GDPR – international transfers

  • UK GDPR update

  • Understanding adoption law and placement orders – what, where and how?

  • Understanding Local Authority planning for children’s placements in care cases

  • Use of injunctions in personal protection cases

  • Using options in development transactions

  • Wardship and inherent jurisdictionComing soon

  • Wardship and inherent jurisdiction in children cases

  • What’s new in AML 2023

  • Where are we now with the test for mental capacity in will making?

  • that in of themselves do useful things” but when put together they “do even smarter things”.

    He said: “Kira and Neota are terrific in their own right [but] actually when you think about ideas and combine them, the sum of the parts is even greater than the individual pieces”.

    Mr Waisberg said bricolage meant “clients [are] able to extend systems without even the vendor knowing that’s happening… our clients can dream up ways to use our systems… and build them into something greater than we would ever have thought of doing ourselves”.

    Elsewhere at the conference, an eight-product competitive pitch for the 2017 Legal Geek start-up award was won by AI-enabled contract management platform, Juro. The runner-up was F-LEX, an on-demand legal service for paralegals.

    Jimmy Vestbirk, the founder of Legal Geek, said Juro had had a “spectacular” year. He added that the conference was “just another example of how the legal tech sector continues to disrupt the legal industry, and make improvements to it”.

    He continued: “Today’s event was twice the size of our inaugural [conference] in 2016 and that is all due to our members far and wide who continue to invest their time to meet and network with each other, swap ideas, and drive legal tech forward.”

    Tags:




    Leave a Comment

    By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

    Required fields are marked *
    Email address will not be published.

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Blog


    Use the tools available to stop doing the work you shouldn’t be doing anyway

    We are increasingly taken for granted in the world of Do It Yourself, in which we’re required to do some of the work we have ostensibly paid for, such as in banking, travel and technology


    Quality indicators – peer recommendations over review websites

    I often feel that I am banging the SRA’s drum for them when it comes to transparency but it’s because I genuinely believe in clarity when it comes to promoting quality professional services.


    Embracing the future: Navigating AI in litigation

    Whilst the UK courts have shown resistance to change over time, in the past decade they have embraced the use of some technologies that naturally improve efficiency. Now we’re in the age of AI.


    Loading animation