Ex-FBI cyber chief warns lawyers over corporate espionage

Waisberg (right) and Wildisen: combining AI products can increase impact

Basic digital housekeeping like keeping software up-to-date and backing up data separately from your network will solve most cyber-security issues – with corporate espionage one issue law firms have to face – according to a former assistant director of the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).

Speaking at Tuesday’s Legal Geek conference in London, John Boles, who directed the FBI’s global cyber operations and investigations during his 21-year career with the agency, said the cyber threat was real and “as bad as everybody says”.

He reported that during his time at the FBI, in the US alone there were over 6,000 active cases of cyber attack at any given time, ranging from ransomware and malware, to DDOS (denial of service). But these were “only the tip of the iceberg”, he said, because most attacks went unreported.

He said law firms were susceptible to attempted corporate espionage, especially if they were involved in “antagonistic cases”. He added: “It’s not uncommon for folks to be trying to find out what the other side’s thinking”.

But he said that much of the cyber-security battle could be won if firms “do the basics”. This included updating and regularly implementing software ‘patches’ provided by the vendor – aimed at removing security vulnerabilities.

Also, since ransomware attacks often targeted network-connected devices for encryption until a ransom was paid to unencrypt them, it was common sense to keep back-ups separate, he said. Firms should also keep passwords secure and ask themselves “does everyone in [the] company need to have access?”

Everyday software added to networks sometimes “shipped with security settings set to low or zero”, which needed customising on installation, he warned.

Mr Boles concluded: “The bad guys are out there and are thinking how can they monetise your data quicker than you can… Nobody loves your data like you love your data. It’s your crown jewels.”

Meanwhile, also at the conference, Noah Waisberg and Greg Wildisen, respectively the chief executive and international managing director of artificial intelligence (AI) software providers Kira Systems and Neota Logic, which are used by legal firms around the world to process documents and data, gave a joint presentation.

The pair described a phenomenon called ‘bricolage’, which is the use of more than one AI system in sequence to create a more powerful data refinement tool.

Mr Waisberg gave the example of a collaboration between three legal tech companies, Neota, Kira and data-sharing platform HighQ by Australian-based law firm, Allen. The three companies collaborated to create an AI application known as REDDA (Real Estate Due Diligence App) to analyse huge lease portfolios and flag areas for further review.

Mr Wildisen described bricolage as “taking tech

  • An Introduction To Property Investment

  • Commercial Property Winter UpdateComing soon

  • Construction and Interpretation Issues – Wills

  • Contentious Probate Round Up 2020Coming soon

  • Contentious Wills, Trusts and Estates for the Non-Contentious Practitioner

  • Corporate Law UpdateComing soon

  • Default and Sanctions 2021Coming soon

  • Domestic Abuse – Law and Practice for busy Family Practitioners: What Do I Need To Know?Coming soon

  • Easements – Key Issues and UpdateComing soon

  • Environmental Law for Property Lawyers

  • Family Law – The Key Case Law Developments of 2020Coming soon

  • Fire Safety In Multi Storey, Multi Occupied Residential BuildingsComing soon

  • Fraud and CyberCrime Update 2020Coming soon

  • How The Latest Costs Rulings Affect Your Practice

  • Insolvency 2020: Advising the company director during Covid-19

  • Latest Inheritance (Provision for Family & Dependents) Act 1975 (IPFD 1975) CasesComing soon

  • Listed Buildings – Key IssuesComing soon

  • Local Authority Parallel Planning Fostering and Adoption Processes – Current Practice 2020

  • LPAs – Tips and Traps From Recent Cases

  • Making Wills Using Video Conferencing – What It Means For Practitioners

  • Minimising and Ending Lease Obligations for Struggling Tenants – Landlord’s consent for alterations, change of use, sub-letting: tips for tenants

  • Modifying Restrictive CovenantsComing soon

  • Monthly Update on Wills Probate Trusts Tax and Elderly Client December 2020Coming soon

  • Monthly Update on Wills Probate Trusts Tax and Elderly Client January 2021Coming soon

  • Monthly Update on Wills Probate Trusts Tax and Elderly Client November 2020

  • Newbuild – Points To Consider

  • Online Defamation UpdateComing soon

  • Part 36 Update

  • Residential Property Autumn Update

  • Residential Property Practice UpdateComing soon

  • Retail Leases in a Changing World Part 1 – Turnover Rents, New Use Classes Order, Breaking the Lease, Quiet Enjoyment and Derogation from GrantComing soon

  • Retail Leases in a Changing World Part 2 – Keep-Open Covenants, Tenant Insolvency and CIGA, Landlord’s Consent and Terminal DilapidationsComing soon

  • Secure Accommodation and Deprivation Cases Involving Children: Essential Knowledge and Update

  • SRA Accounts Rules Update 2020

  • SRA Standards and Regulations – Risks Challenges and Opportunities

  • Tax Implications of Separation and DivorceComing soon

  • Unusual Grant ApplicationsComing soon

  • What really drives consumers to choose your PI firm?

  • Will Drafting and the RNRBComing soon

  • IHT Treatment of 18-25 Trusts

  • Minimising and Ending Lease Obligations for Struggling Tenants Part 1

  • GDPR Update Autumn 2020

  • Ten Traps To Avoid In Leases

  • Contentious Issues in Discretionary Trusts

  • Lies, Exaggeration and Fundamental Dishonesty

  • Monthly Update on Wills Probate Trusts Tax and Elderly Client October 2020

  • Anti Money Laundering Update 2020

  • Spousal By-Pass Trusts – Are They Still Helpful?

  • Planning and Building Regulations – Key Aspects

  • Tenant Default and Landlords’ Remedies: Practical Solutions In The Time Of Covid-19

  • Commercial Property Autumn Update

  • Recovery of Success Fees in Inheritance Act Claims

  • Monthly Update on Wills Probate Trusts Tax and Elderly Client September 2020

  • Financial Remedies Cohabitation and Marital Breakdown Autumn Update 2020

  • Public Children Law 2020 – Key Principles and Updates

  • Monthly Update on Wills Probate Trusts Tax and Elderly Client July/August 2020

  • Private Children Law 2020 – Key Principles and Updates

  • Special Guardianship and Child Arrangement Orders – Developments and Core Principles

  • Implied Terms and Good Faith – Key Issues

  • Residential Property Practice Update

  • Build Over Agreements, Septic Tanks and Lateral Drains

  • Private Client Update May 2020

  • Satisfaction and Ademption in Wills

  • Conducting Advocacy in Children and Personal Protection Family Cases

  • To AirBnB Or Not To B: The Impact of Short-Term Lets on Leasehold Covenants

  • How To Get Witness Statements Right

  • Residential Property Summer 2020 Update

  • Enforcing Landlords’ Covenants: The Practical Options

  • Private Client Update June 2020

  • Pre-Emption Rights – Tips and Traps

  • Burial Ashes and Funeral Disputes

  • Commercial Property Summer Update

  • Trespass, Nuisance and Other Neighbour Disputes

  • The RICS Code for Leasing Business Premises 1st Edition

  • Reporting Chargeable Events in Trusts

  • Commercial Law Update

  • Financial Order Cases 2020 – Update and Developments

  • SDLT: the latest developments

  • Topical Issues in Estate Administration

  • Serving A Claim Form – Avoiding The Traps For The Unwary

  • What Have We Learnt Recently About Assessing Testamentary Capacity?

  • Drafting and Amending Tenant Break Clauses in Commercial Leases

  • The Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 – A Brave New World

  • Pleading Cases – What You Need To Know And Do

  • Shared Ownership Leases

  • Valid Gifts by Attorneys

  • GDPR Update

  • Funding and Costs in the Employment Tribunal

  • Conditional Contracts – Avoiding The Pitfalls

  • COFA Update

  • Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Update

  • Key Civil Procedure Rule Changes April 2020

  • Dealing with Delicate and Difficult Employees

  • Private Client Update February 2020

  • Estate Rentcharges

  • COLP Update

  • Bank of Mum and Dad – Loan or Gift Consequences

  • Money Laundering Update -Spring 2020

  • Drafting and Amending Service Charge Clauses in Commercial Leases

  • Children and Family Law: Spring 2020 Update

  • Adverse Possession

  • Commercial Property Spring Update

  • Personal Injury Reform – What And When?

  • Private Client Update March 2020

  • Securing Indemnity Costs and Other Favourable Costs Orders

  • Income Tax in Estate Administration

  • Force Majeure – Key Issues and Alternatives

  • Will Preparation In The Time Of Coronavirus

  • Ground Rent and Lease Term Issues including Lenders Requirements

  • Residential Property Practice Update

  • Regulatory Update 2020

  • Deputyship Issues

  • Up With The Lark(e) or Dead as a Dodo

  • Discounted Gift Trusts – An Explanation

  • Tenant Insolvency and Covid-19: The Impact on Landlords

  • Construction Issues for Property Lawyers

  • Private Client Update April 2020

  • Land Registry Practice

  • Running Family Matters During The Covid-19 Pandemic – Part 1

  • Running Family Matters During The Covid-19 Pandemic – Part 2

  • Executing Documents Using Electronic Signatures

  • Will Drafting Tips

  • Covid-19, Cybersecurity and Other Compliance Issues

  • Lease Extension and Enfranchisement – Review and Update

  • Lost The Will! Lost Wills – Practice and Procedure

  • Consortium Agreements and Collaboration Agreements – Avoiding The Pitfalls

  • Effective costs recovery: Lessons from the courts in 2020

  • The Revised Domestic Abuse Bill 2020 – Part 1

  • The Revised Domestic Abuse Bill 2020 – Part 2

  • The Supreme Court Ruling in Duval: The Impact on Residential Leases

  • Settlements and the RNRB – A Refresher

  • Private Client Update January 2020

  • Residential Property Winter Update

  • Consent in Property Contracts – The View From The Supreme Court

  • Drafting Indexation Clauses

  • Corporate Law Update

  • SRA Accounts Rules Update

  • How To Prepare For A Tribunal Hearing – A Practical Guide

  • New Money Laundering Regulations 2019 – Update for 2020

  • Section 106 Agreements and Community Infrastructure Levy

  • How the forthcoming reforms in 2020/2021 will affect your practice and income

  • Private Client Update December 2019

  • Marketing Your Private Client Business To Beat The Competition

  • Promotion Agreements

  • Marketing the Professional Firm in the New Regulatory Environment

  • Family Law – Case Law Round Up for 2019

  • Overage: Practical Considerations

  • Quantum Arguments in Tribunal Cases

  • Major Injury Developments in 2019

  • Liquidated Damages

  • Estate Planning Today

  • 10 Tricky Legal Decisions: The Unfortunate Impact

  • Commercial Property Winter Update

  • Private Client Update November 2019

  • Incoterms 2020 – The Key Changes You Need To Know About

  • Unfair Dismissal – Exceptions to the General Rule

  • Sale of Part: Practical Issues

  • Local Authority Parallel Planning Fostering and Adoption Processes – Current Practice

  • Consumer Law Update

  • Tenant Amendment to Commercial Leases – Rent Review

  • Pensions in Estate Administration

  • Part 36 and Settlement Developments of 2019

  • Is Indemnity Insurance Always The Answer?

  • Charitable Giving

  • PI Futures Conference 2020

  • that in of themselves do useful things” but when put together they “do even smarter things”.

    He said: “Kira and Neota are terrific in their own right [but] actually when you think about ideas and combine them, the sum of the parts is even greater than the individual pieces”.

    Mr Waisberg said bricolage meant “clients [are] able to extend systems without even the vendor knowing that’s happening… our clients can dream up ways to use our systems… and build them into something greater than we would ever have thought of doing ourselves”.

    Elsewhere at the conference, an eight-product competitive pitch for the 2017 Legal Geek start-up award was won by AI-enabled contract management platform, Juro. The runner-up was F-LEX, an on-demand legal service for paralegals.

    Jimmy Vestbirk, the founder of Legal Geek, said Juro had had a “spectacular” year. He added that the conference was “just another example of how the legal tech sector continues to disrupt the legal industry, and make improvements to it”.

    He continued: “Today’s event was twice the size of our inaugural [conference] in 2016 and that is all due to our members far and wide who continue to invest their time to meet and network with each other, swap ideas, and drive legal tech forward.”


    Leave a Comment

    By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

    Required fields are marked *
    Email address will not be published.

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


    Should we tax people working from home?

    German investment bank Deutsche Bank recently recommended that those working remotely should pay more in taxes, saying it was a viable solution to create a more inclusive economy.

    The future may be blended

    Attitudes to technology in access to justice might beneficially follow the trajectory of the earlier debate about the best way to deliver legal aid services.

    Loading animation