EU anti-money laundering plans put client confidentiality at risk, Law Society warns


Anti-money laundering changes: possible increase in red tape

Client confidentiality could be undermined by proposed changes to the European money laundering directive, the Law Society has warned.

The removal of simplified due diligence provisions for client accounts is among a number of proposals included in the commission’s fourth directive on money laundering to which the society objects.

The society noted that although simplified due diligence provisions were no longer specifically contained in the proposed fourth directive, individual countries could allow simplification within their jurisdictions, which might result in differing regimes across Europe.

Removing specific simplification provisions for client accounts “could… undermine client confidentiality and result in disproportionate data processing by financial institutions”, warned the society, adding: “The Law Society will be looking carefully at these provisions and making representations to ensure that the simplification measures do not actually result in an increase in red tape and compliance activity.”

Another key concern is a new requirement for all companies and others to hold up-to-date information on their beneficial owners and to make it available to anyone doing anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CTF) due diligence and to law enforcement agencies.

The society said: “[We have] previously cautioned that this approach will be likely to impose significant administrative burdens on legitimate companies, with subsidiaries having to be kept updated on share ownership changes across entire company groups, possibly on a daily basis. It is not clear how this will make a significant difference to the fight against financial crime.”

In its summary of responses to its own consultation looking ahead to the fourth directive last June, the society said: “Regulated entities often find obtaining information about beneficial ownership a challenging and resource intensive aspect of their AML/CTF compliance…

“Such measures should carefully weigh the competing legitimate privacy concerns of beneficial owners and the proportionality of expectations placed on corporate bodies in providing extra information during these challenging economic times. “

Another issue the Law Society said it would raise with the European Commission was the proposal that all supporting documents for a transaction must not be retained for more than 10 years after the business relationship ends. This could cause problems for lawyers, said the society, because “[it] does not fully take into account the types of documents held by legal professionals (such as wills) or the consequences of limitation periods”.

Lastly, the society expressed concern about a proposal that every law firm will have to have written AML/CTF assessments, policies and procedures, and some means to test their effectiveness. It cautioned: “This requirement should be implemented in a manner which is proportionate to the size of the law firm.”

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

21 November 2019

Analysing the October PII renewal

Our clients that renewed during this period recorded an average fee increase of 7.5%. The partner size segment that experienced the largest growth in percentage terms was 11-25 partners, at 11.3%.

Read More

Loading animation