Entrepreneur-backed Defence Hub promises to “revolutionise” criminal defence market

Print This Post

6 December 2013

Crime: Defence Hub says it puts financial value back into the duty solicitor’s scheme

A new business owned by “non-solicitor entrepreneurs” who have already invested £10m is promising to revolutionise the way in which criminal defence work is undertaken.

Defence Hub is predicting that it will turnover more than £50m in its first year and will both employ solicitors and work with other law firms, guaranteeing them a 21.6% gross margin on any “case management file”.

It is a largely digital service, and not a law firm, that goes live on 28 January 2014, focusing on casework preparation and advocacy. It said it has already secured 12 offices around the country.

“The service will reduce costs, and puts financial value back into the duty solicitor’s scheme,” Defence Hub said in a statement issued this evening.

The business said it has already hired over 70 full-time solicitors and higher court advocates, with an additional 50 vacancies being offered by January and 180 more by the end of 2014.

Further, over 20 “carefully hand-selected criminal defence firms of various sizes, including a top-five legal aid provider, have signed three-year contracts with Defence Hub, which in turn guarantees each of them a 21.6% return on non-own client related casework”.

Neither the identity of who is behind Defence Hub nor how it works is known at the moment, although more details should be released shortly.

Its current public face is recruiter Sean Smith of Eximius Law, whose advertisement in the Law Society Gazette for 120 criminal defence solicitors caught the attention of the legal community. He told Legal Futures that the backers – who have already put in £10m, mainly towards an IT system – are UK based and already involved in the legal services market.

He said the model – which has been run past the Ministry of Justice – is one already operated in several countries, but nobody had thought to bring it to the UK until now.

Though technically Defence Hub is an “enabler” of criminal defence legal aid services, the legal aid contract was drafted in such a way that it allowed the business also to employ solicitors.

Other criminal law firms will have an opportunity to enrol with Defence Hub from 28 January 2014. Mr Smith said Defence Hub estimated that its model could accommodate 72% of the firms that currently provide criminal defence services.


One Response to “Entrepreneur-backed Defence Hub promises to “revolutionise” criminal defence market”

  1. Do journalists not check their stories any more ?

    The domain name http://www.defencehub.co.uk was registered on behalf of Bamsboard Limited on 13th November 2013.

    Unfortunately a search at companies house shows that Bamsboard Limited was dissolved on 12th Novemver 2013.

    So how has a dissolved company continued trading ?

    The only director of Bamsboard Limited was Stephen Beverley, a solicitor.

    Of course Sean Smith the legal recruitment guru was the self styled CEO of Bamsboard and his twitter account shows he has had a Bamsboard e-mail account.

    How exactly does a dissolved company invest £10 million in IT ? And how have all these law firms signed up with a company that doesn’t exist ? Doesnt anyone check who they are dealing with any more ?

    And if Defence Hub is nothing to do with Bamsboard Limited, why is its website registered in the name of a dissolved company ?

    A classic example of a journalist not checking facts. Why not tell us who really is behind Defence Hub if it isnt the Bamsboard crew of Smith, Beverley and Thomas.

  2. Sue R Pipe on December 6th, 2013 at 10:40 pm

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

How best to achieve independent regulation under the Legal Services Act?

Craig Wakeford LSB

Independent regulation gives confidence to consumers, providers, investors and society as a whole that legal services work in the public interest and support the rule of law. The Legal Services Act 2007 does not require all approved regulators to be structurally separate from representative bodies. Instead, the Legal Services Board is required by the Act to produce internal governance rules (IGR) which apply the principle of regulatory independence in legal service regulation. We are currently running a consultation on the IGR which continues until 9 February.

January 19th, 2018