End of the annual accountant’s report is nigh


Accountant’s report: historic information, says SRA

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has unveiled plans to remove the requirement that firms have their client accounts reviewed by an independent accountant and submit an annual accountant’s report.

Instead, the compliance officer for finance and administration (COFA) will be given the power to certify – at practising certificate renewal stage – that they are satisfied the firm is managing its client in accordance with the SRA Account Rules.

In a consultation published yesterday, the SRA said: “It is our view that the cost to firms of engaging a reporting accountant, followed by the cost to the SRA in processing all annual accounts, can no longer be justified by the risks identified through this exercise.

“These policy proposals will reduce the unnecessary regulatory burden of a compulsory report and will give firms the flexibility to decide the best methods to satisfy themselves that the SRA requirements of good financial management and protection of client money are met.

“In turn, the changes will enable the SRA to release resources and focus them on targeted regulation where we have concerns over a firm’s management of client money. This will include the SRA imposing a requirement for an accountant’s report where necessary either on an annual basis or as part of supervisory, investigative, or enforcement activity.”

It estimated that among the 9,000 firms holding client money, small firms might have to pay £800 for an accountant’s report and larger firms “several thousand”.

More than half every year are qualified, usually for minor breaches, with just 200 referred for further examination. Of these, usually only about 10 result in a fuller investigation.

Storage alone of the last six years’ of reports and destroying them securely cost the SRA as much as £200,000 a year.

The SRA said a further problem is that the reports are historic in nature, and while reporting accountants are required “immediately” to report evidence of fraud or theft or other material issues, there is a potential duplication with the duties of compliance officers.

The SRA admitted the account rules “may not satisfactorily or optimally… manage risks appropriately” and said they would be reviewed.

The reporting reform, which would represent a significant enhancement of the COFA role, was said to be “appropriate and proportionate” to the risk presented to clients’ money. The current requirement to submit annual reports “is neither sufficiently targeted nor proportionate”.

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


A new route to practice rights for chartered legal executives

Following approval from the Legal Services Board in May 2022, CILEx Regulation has launched an alternative route for chartered legal executives to obtain independent practice rights.


NFTs, the courts and the role of injunctions

In May, news broke that a non-fungible token was the subject of a successful injunction made by the Singapore High Court. The NFT in question is part of the very valuable Bored Ape Yacht Club series.


Matthew Pascall

Low-value commercial cases – an achievable challenge for ATE insurers

There are many good claims brought for damages that are likely to be significantly less than twice the cost of bringing the claim. These cases present a real challenge for insurers.


Loading animation