Electronic signatures “largest area of change” for property industry

Electronic signatures: Take-up driven by short-term needs

The use of electronic signatures has been the “single largest area of change” in technology for the property industry over the past 18 months, a survey has found.

The conveyancing process was viewed by most property professionals as the main source of delays in 2021, followed by property searches, though residential conveyancers put searches top of the list.

The report, The New Normal, by search provider TM Group and sales platform mio, was based on responses from 800 residential conveyancers, estate agents, lenders, surveyors and commercial real estate professionals.

When asked which new technologies they would be implementing, most professionals said electronic signatures, followed by case management tech and digital government services.

Researchers said the type of technologies adopted over the last 18 months were “driven by short-term needs rather than longer-term planning” and increased use of electronic signatures, a “good example of this”, was the “single largest area of change”.

The move was “driven both by an obvious short-term requirement and the relative ease at which such technology can be adopted” by opening an online account with leading providers.

“Beyond this, it would be reasonable to assume that the same would be true with onboarding solutions.

“Client portals are also being adopted to enable and manage online communication with customers, and those again can often be easily sourced and activated through existing search providers and others.

“However, there was a sense that bigger and more fundamental investment decisions around technology, such as case management software, had again been postponed and would be looked at in 2022.”

A government-backed industry working group said earlier this month in a report for the Law Commission that the most sophisticated kind of electronic signatures could be more reliable than signatures witnessed the traditional way.

Researchers said the conveyancing process had “come under substantial and sustained pressure” during the course of the pandemic.

“The average time taken to transact a property, which was taking almost four months prior to the pandemic, has been seen to rise to over six months according to some.

“It’s then no real surprise that respondents identified the conveyancing process itself as the single biggest cause of delays, followed by the time taken to obtain relevant property searches, as well as taking time to blame other parties.”

Researchers said many local authorities had “reduced and restricted access to their search provision”, which caused average search times to double at times.

“There were even several high-profile authorities where search times increased by over a month.

“Delays were then exacerbated by the volume of associated communication that was demanded by all parties, giving rise to the view that other parties contributed to the problem.”

Residential conveyancers ranked searches as the top source of delays, followed by the conveyancing process and “other parties in the transaction”.

When asked about the impact of the last 12 months on their businesses, the most common impact for all types of property professional was increased working hours. Conveyancers were most likely to rank this top, estate agents the least.

For conveyancers, the next most important impacts were reduced staff and increased fees/profitability. For estate agents the second biggest impact was reduced fees/profitability, followed by higher costs.

More than 10% of property professionals said their firm did “nothing” when it came to wellbeing initiatives. More than two thirds of these firms (68%) were residential conveyancers.

When asked which factors would have the greatest impact on their roles in 2022, consumer confidence was the most important choice for estate agents. However, for conveyancers this came in third place, behind interest rates and ‘longer term pandemic uncertainty’.

    Readers Comments

  • Archie Courage says:

    HM Land Registry alongside the industry for the ‘digital transformation process in Legal Forms administration’,has one key challenge yet to be tackled head on as regards eSignature. Whilst Advanced esignature is soon be the minimum entry level all round esignature standard i.e. two factor authentication is used by each party signing. The pandemic induced ‘document distancing esignature’ is the next level, known as Qualified Electronic Signatures (QES) i.e. no witness required. QES is more widley used in Europe now. Anyway the UK has not established how the ‘interoperability’ of certificate providers of QES will actually work and is the challenge. The UK can not fall into the trap of single source supply for certificates, choice and competition is needed to ensure competitive pricing. HM Land Registry could perhaps lead the way as a key influencer on this challenge and outline more definitively that this problem needs tackling and they are open to discussion with the technology industry of more than just the large American-based esignature providers. As we all know the data privacy governance of all things American versus European & UK higher standards, gives great concern in the compliance GDPR worlds that affect all size Law firms.
    Real UK based esignature providers who can handle Advanced and QES esignature is a gap needing filled is it not?

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Will solicitors finally be fans of transparency now?

Since the introduction of the SRA’s transparency rules in December 2018, I have been an advocate for law firms going further then the regulatory essentials.

A two-point plan to halve the size of the SRA

I have joked for many years that you could halve the size (and therefore cost) of the Solicitors Regulation Authority overnight by banning both client account and sole practitioners.

Key cyber and data security questions to ask a legal IT provider

One of the growing priorities that law firms face when considering a legal technology provider is cyber and data security, such as their responsibilities and cyber incident management.

Loading animation