Edmonds to back regulators’ education and training review as LSB role is curbed


Edmonds: benchmarks for rigour of review

Legal Services Board (LSB) chairman David Edmonds will tomorrow back a review of legal education and training but warn that he expects it to be far-reaching, Legal Futures has learned.

However, we understand that the LSB had originally planned to conduct the review itself, but has been persuaded to let the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), Bar Standards Board and ILEX Professional Standards take the lead under the LSB’s oversight.

There are concerns among the various legal regulators that at times the LSB is at risk of going beyond its oversight role, and this struggle could be the latest manifestation of that.

Delivering the annual Upjohn lecture in London, Mr Edmonds will set out a series of benchmarks against which the LSB will judge the robustness of the independent, strategic review. It will be the first time he has seriously addressed the issue of education and training, following a recent speech by LSB chief executive Chris Kenny. The board’s interest in the issue comes primarily under the regulatory objective in the Legal Services Act of “encouraging an independent, strong, diverse and effective legal profession”.

The review will be informed by a group convened by the regulators and will be undertaken in parallel with additional research to be undertaken by the individual regulators.

SRA chief executive Antony Townsend will tell the SRA board tomorrow that the authroity will be continuing its review of training contract policy through the work-based learning pilot and will be embarking on a fundamental review of continuing professional development over the next 12 months.

“Both of these projects will feed into, and be informed by, the wider review,” he writes in his report to the board.

Legal Futures will report on the speech tomorrow evening after it has been delivered.

Tags:




Blog


AI risk: What law firms must now demand from vendors

AI systems ingest, transform, infer and generate. Treating them as equivalent to document storage or workflow tools is a category error.


Why mid-sized firms are the most interesting story in UK legal right now

Mid-sized law firms are facing a set of decisions about structure, technology and growth that will define where they sit in the market for the next decade.


Don’t be fooled by the civil court statistics

The latest civil justice figures look deceptively upbeat, with faster claims. But these numbers mask a deeper truth: people are still waiting more than a year for justice.


Loading animation