Earnings of criminal legal aid barristers fall 8% in two years


money

Experience was not well rewarded by the AGFS

The fee income of Crown Court legal aid barristers from the Advocated Graduated Fee Scheme (AGFS) has fallen by 8% in the last two years, new figures have shown.

As overall earnings declined, female and BME defence barristers fared relatively better, with both groups earning on average 3% more from the scheme than their colleagues.

The earnings of QCs were not included in the report, published yesterday by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), on behalf of a joint research group made up of representatives from the Bar Council, Criminal Bar Association, Legal Aid Agency and MoJ.

Of around 4,300 barristers who received some income from the AGFS, only 39% consistently provided “substantial advocacy” over a number of years.

During the financial years 2013-23, 2013-4 and 2014-5, the average gross income of these barristers fell from £69,000 to £65,000. As with other figures for barristers’ earnings, VAT and the cost of chambers are not included.

The smaller group of “notionally full-time” criminal legal aid barristers did better, with fees declining during the period from £97,000 to £90,000. Almost two thirds of this group (64%) earned over £50,000 from the scheme, and a third earned over £100,000.

Experience was not well rewarded by the AGFS. Average fee income increased by around 2% for every five years of experience, equating to a 14% increase over the 35-year career of a Crown Court defence barrister.

Alistair MacDonald QC, chairman of the Bar Council, said the report provided “clear evidence” that barristers’ fees for criminal legal aid work had fallen.

“At the very junior end, it is not uncommon for a barrister to put in a hard day’s work at a magistrates’ court and still fail to make the minimum wage.

“This report also shows that the payment structure provides little scope for career progression for criminal barristers.

“It takes many years of practice and training at the Bar to prosecute and defend complex criminal cases, but if it is unaffordable for young barristers to pursue this line of work, we will find cases collapsing due to a lack of experienced counsel.”

Sam Mercer, head of equality and diversity at the Bar Council, warned that the diversity of the junior criminal Bar could suffer.

“A low, flat, pay structure exacerbates the difficulties faced by talented female barristers who have to pay for childcare and it is a disincentive to those from modest financial backgrounds struggling with student debt.

“Our adversarial system of justice demands that individuals of exceptional ability should work in this challenging area of law. Restricting the diversity of the criminal Bar means we risk losing out on much-needed talent.”

Tags:




    Readers Comments

  • tombo4 says:

    “… VAT and the cost of chambers are not included”. What does this mean? Government persistently includes VAT in these figures, and the cost of chambers is never paid anyway, but still has to be met from the figures.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

No larger firm can ignore the demands of innovation – that was the clear message from our most recent roundtable: “The law firm of the future”, sponsored by LexisNexis Enterprise Solutions. It comes in many forms, predominantly but not just technology, and is not simply a case of automating process. Expertise and process are not mutually exclusive.

Blog

12 December 2018

Open justice and technology: Friend or foe?

Why not use this new age of technology to represent your client in court by simply logging on? However, with representation conducted from the privacy of your own space, just how ‘open’ might this process be?

Read More