Dissolved company’s files “still privileged”, says court


Files: Privilege maintained until there is no prospect of it being enforced

Legal professional privilege can protect the documents of a dissolved company from disclosure, the High Court has ruled in a case involving global firm Dentons.

Master Clark said the principle ‘once privileged, always privileged’ compelled the court to maintain the privilege “unless and until there is no prospect” of it being enforced.

He said the court had to determine the extent to which it “should have regard to the fact that the company could, as a matter of law, be restored”, even though the “practical likelihood of this is remote”.

Master Clark went on: “This may be tested by considering the position if an application for restoration had been made, but was not to be determined until after the hearing of this application – the court would then, in my judgment, be bound to protect the privilege which was about to be revested in the company.

“However, it is difficult to distinguish in principle between that situation and the present one, where, although no application to restore has been made, there is and will be no bar to it being made until 20 June 2036.

“Not enforcing the privilege means contemplating the position where, having been restored to the register and otherwise placed in the position it was before dissolution, the privilege to which the company should then be entitled would be irretrievably lost.”

The High Court heard in Addlesee & Others v Dentons Europe [2018] EWHC 3010 (Ch) that the claimants were 240 investors in a scheme operated by Anabus Holdings, a Cypriot company now dissolved, under which they were invited to invest in gold dust.

The claimants, who said they lost over €6.5m, sought a declaration that client files held by Dentons in respect of the company were not protected by legal professional privilege.

Master Clark dismissed the claimant’s application as it related to legal professional privilege. He added that the issue of the “so-called iniquity exception to such privilege remained an issue between the parties.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

No larger firm can ignore the demands of innovation – that was the clear message from our most recent roundtable: “The law firm of the future”, sponsored by LexisNexis Enterprise Solutions. It comes in many forms, predominantly but not just technology, and is not simply a case of automating process. Expertise and process are not mutually exclusive.

Blog

18 December 2018

Why we need robot rules

In 2016, an AI program called AlphaGo beat the world champion at the board game Go. At one point, AlphaGo made a decision which baffled everyone but turned out to be the winning move.

Read More