“Disgraceful” solicitor struck off for misusing power of attorney and creating fake wills to pocket £250k

Will: solicitor faked two

A “disgraceful” solicitor has been struck off after taking around £250,000 from a client under a power of attorney after he had died and also creating false wills for other deceased clients to pay off the legitimate beneficiaries of the first estate.

Peter Charles Davies said the beneficiaries were “hassling” him to distribute money from the estate of a Mr AW, so he faked the wills to access money from other estates.

The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) said he thought it would be harder to detect his conduct given that both clients were dead.

He also used Mr AW’s account as a conduit for money dishonestly obtained from other estates, while in two unconnected cases was found to have pocketed fees paid in cash by clients of as little as £180.

Mr Davies, who was born in 1957 and qualified in 1995, was an assistant solicitor until March 2016 at Parry Davies Clnwyd Jones & Lloyd LLP in Gwynedd, south Wales.

Mr Davies admitted each of nine allegations that he had dishonestly breached the rules between 2010 and 2016. Most of the money was withdrawn at cash points over the years.

The tribunal recorded that at around the time he was dismissed from the firm, he confessed to two of the partners that he “had been helping himself to some of the money from Mr AW’s estate”, but could not remember how much.

In 2015 Mr Davies created two fraudulent wills in relation to unrelated estates that included payments of £50,000 and £20,000 to beneficiaries of Mr AW’s estate.

He later told the Solicitors Regulation Authority investigator that he added the beneficiaries because “they were hassling me to distribute… um… and I gave in by doing that”.

Describing his conduct as “disgraceful”, the SDT said Mr Davies had “plundered the estates of deceased clients for his own personal purposes causing losses to the beneficiaries”.

He had, it concluded, “demonstrated a shocking abuse of the trust placed in him and was not fit to be a solicitor”.

Mr Davies was also ordered to pay £17,000 in costs.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Will the SQE affect diversity in the legal profession?

Law firms are under increasingly pressure to attract a more diverse pool of young lawyers. One of the fundamental motivations behind introducing the SQE was to address this issue.

Should the SRA introduce tougher sanctions for AML breaches?

We have recently seen the Solicitors Regulation Authority fining law firms across England and Wales over a lack of proper anti-money laundering policies and procedures.

EHCPs and the uphill struggle for justice

The staggering truth behind the education system supporting children with special education needs and disabilities is that 80% of SEND children don’t receive the regular in-school support they need.

Loading animation