Disciplined solicitor blames failings on legal aid cuts


Criminal law: Solicitor retained disbursements

A criminal sole practitioner has been fined for offences including failure to distribute legal aid payments for professional disbursements, which he blamed on having laid off a manager after the firm suffered from government cutbacks.

Meanwhile, it took him more than a year to supply an imprisoned client’s file to the body dealing with miscarriages of justice when it was requested.

Solicitor Mark Ian Williams admitted failing to pay nearly £12,000 of professional disbursements in 2014, delaying for 14 months before sending a client file to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), and failing to submit accountant reports.

In a judgment on an agreed outcome, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal said while the admissions were to “moderately serious professional conduct”, his culpability was nevertheless “high” and the period of misconduct “significant”.

It assessed a delay in sending information to the CCRC as “potentially [causing] significant harm” to a client. However, it accepted good character references and approved the agreed outcome.

The CCRC complained to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) in an effort to get Mr Williams to speed up.

At the time, Mr Williams, who was born in 1960 and admitted in 1992, was a sole practitioner at MWA Solicitors in Aldershot, Hampshire, which closed in 2014.

In mitigation he said his practice had suffered from a post-LASPO reduction in income and had laid off his accounts manager as a result, which he claimed with hindsight was a “catalyst” for many of the firm’s administrative difficulties.

He said he had sought to transfer ownership of the firm to his senior management team, “recognising that his strengths lay in casework rather than on the administration and management of an office and practice”. But there had been problems with the transfer.

He pointed out he had practised for 26 years and operated his own business for 19 years without regulatory issues. He was now a consultant criminal advocate with another firm and had no intention of becoming a principal again.

Experts not paid, although Mr Williams had received money for them from the Legal Aid Agency, included several psychiatrists and a forensic consultant.

The agreement said the SRA had considered the offences worthy of a £4,000, but had reduced it to £3,000 in light of his financial position. Mr Williams will also pay costs of £2,000.

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

22 October 2019

Closing the legal gap through technology

Technology has made few inroads into how most people experience legal services. This is puzzling at a time when technology has transformed so many aspects of our lives, and when the big commercial law firms are investing heavily.

Read More

Loading animation