Direct access business goes bust “leaving clients out out pocket”


Gittins: Sole director

An eight-year-old direct access business that said it could save clients half or more of the cost of a solicitor through its fixed-fee unbundled service has gone into liquidation.

The reasons why Absolute Barrister has gone out of business are not yet clear. It was set up in 2013 by married barristers Simon and Katy Gittins, although according to Companies House, Mrs Gittins resigned as a director in 2017, leaving Mr Gittins as the sole director.

London insolvency practitioners AABRS confirmed to Legal Futures that they have been instructed to assist the board in placing the company into a creditors voluntary liquidation.

The work was at an early stage and a spokesman said he was unable to provide any details.

He added: “I can state that the board of directors have informed me that they have communicated individually with former clients requiring legal representation to contact a particular third-party advocate who may be willing and able to assist.”

According to the i newspaper, which broke the story, the collapse has left “an unspecified number of clients facing the loss of fees”, which it understood to be several thousand pounds in some cases, paid in advance.

It quoted an unnamed solicitor as saying she had been approached by an Absolute Barrister client whose entire legal budget had been lodged with the website.

Speaking to Legal Futures in 2016, Mr Gittins said the service had more than 200 barristers on its books.

Writing on the Bar Council website the same year, he advised barristers to focus on their legal expertise more broadly, given that consumers “probably don’t know or care” what was meant by the word ‘advocacy’.

Mr Gittins’ LinkedIn profile states: “We are re-engineering the way legal services are supplied to make them better, faster and more accessible.

“Combining market leading tech with expert barristers means that we can dramatically reduce cost to the client for expert advice, increasing access to justice.

“We are not just delivering what exists in a more advanced way. We are delivering what has never existed before in the most advanced way.”

The site told users it could “typically save half, sometimes two thirds and even more with longer engagements”.

A survey it commissioned on launch found that 54% of Britons – and “a staggering 42% of those working in the legal industry” – thought solicitors overcharged.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


GEO – the impact of AI on digital marketing for law firms

GEO represents the biggest change in online business generation that I can remember. You cannot afford to stick with the same old engine optimisation techniques.


What the law can learn from fintech’s onboarding revolution

Client onboarding has always been slow. It’s not just about the paperwork and manual workflows; it’s also about those long AML checks and verifications.


Civil enforcement – progress at last with CJC report

‘When do I get my money?’ is a question that litigators acting for successful parties are used to fielding. The value of judgments is of course in the recovery made.


Loading animation