Diesel claim clients unhappy as firm corrects fees “error” in paperwork

MyDieselClaim: Some clients angry at correction

Class action firm Pogust Goodhead has had to write to the 1.8m clients of its MyDieselClaim brand to correct a “typographical error” in its paperwork that said its fees were capped at 35% of damages, rather than 50%.

The emails have provoked a stream of negative online comments from clients, with some saying they had cancelled their claims for emissions fraud as a result.

The heavily advertised MyDieselClaim is now scoring just 1.3 (out of five) on Trustpilot and Pogust Goodhead a modest 3.2. Reviewers cannot give less than one star. MyDieselClaim has a better 3.6 score on Feefo.

A spokeswoman for the firm, which says nearly 1.8m clients have signed up to MyDieselClaim, said: “We can confirm that an email has been sent out to all MyDieselClaim clients [last week] bringing their attention to an error that has been made in the small print of our conditional fee agreements.

“This relates to a reference of our fees being capped at 35%. This should, as it does in every other section, read 50%.

“In all other documentation and websites, including MoneySavingExpert, we have been clear from the beginning of the legal process that our fees are capped at 50% of damages received.

“However, this typographical error has been spotted in one aspect of the form and so it is our duty to inform our clients of this.

“We are endeavouring to speak to all clients who have any issues and we have given all clients the opportunity to opt out of the claim should they feel they no longer wish to continue.”

To judge by the comments left on Trustpilot, many clients did not understand the nature of the error and believed that the law firm was increasing its cap from 35% to 50%. “I have never known a firm to change their price part way through a process,” wrote one.

Another said: “As soon as they put up the rate of 50% I cancelled the agreement, I suggest everyone else does the same”

A third wrote: “Totally unacceptable from a supposed reputable legal company. 15% x the numbers of claims submitted equals a huge increase in their profits.”

Although Pogust Goodhead responds to reviews on its own Trustpilot profile, it does not appear to do so for MyDieselClaim.

Its replies apologised for the error and confusion, with one stressing that the firm’s fees could end up being “as low as 20%” of the compensation.

Several reviewers also complained that the email was received in the middle of the night.

    Readers Comments

  • David Cummines says:

    I consider that your company should stand by the 35 % as everyone signed up with this more than ample fee,and you should open up your books if your company are claiming more,and indicate how much your company have spent upto and including the date your company finalises everyone’s claims. Infact open book situation.

  • Mark says:

    Q: Has my Diesel Clsim.com actually paid anyone out?

  • Michael Baxendale says:

    It is likely that, as a matter of law, clients have a binding contract for 35% which they can enforce.
    They should insist the firm proceeds on that basis.
    Also they can consider a complaint to the SRA

  • J T Sadler says:

    Been at this since 2021 and despite best efforts Pogust Goodhead no longer reply – outrageous and so very rude and unprofessional.

  • nhawkins says:

    Do you have the original version of this email? like a screenshot or PDF letter? I’m looking into this

  • David Thompson says:

    All this bitching over one error when in fact on all other pages it says 50%, and let’s not forget this is the capped figure as it could be as little as 20%. Even 50% of anything is more than you were getting before they offered to fight your claim.

  • Mark Donnelly says:

    Pogust Goodhead have now emailed me asking if they can purchase my vehicle from me as a sample vehicle. Anyone else been approached like this or know of anyone?

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


The future of organic search for law firms

In a significant turn of events, thousands of internal Google search API documents have recently been leaked, shedding light on the intricate workings of the search giant’s ranking algorithms.

Commercial real estate: The impact of AI and climate change

There is no doubt climate change poses one of the most complex challenges for the legal industry; nonetheless, our research shows firms are adapting.

Empathy, team and happy clients

What has become glaringly obvious to me are the obvious parallels between the legal and financial planning professions, and how much each can learn from the other.

Loading animation