“Decisive reform” needed to restore public trust after SSB scandal


Hayhoe: Regulatory failure had devastating consequences for consumers

The collapse of SSB Law and the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s failures in supervising it demand “decisive reform” to restore public confidence, the Legal Services Consumer Panel has warned.

It also raised questions about the Legal Services Board’s oversight of regulators.

The panel was reacting to the LSB-commissioned report which concluded last week the SRA missed several opportunities to step in at the Sheffield-based law firm much earlier than it finally did in October 2023.

The LSB is now to take enforcement action in the form of a public censure of the SRA and imposing performance targets.

The panel’s statement said the findings “reveal systemic shortcomings in consumer protection and regulatory responsiveness that must be urgently addressed to restore public trust in legal services”.

It continued: “The SSB case is not an isolated incident. It reflects deeper vulnerabilities in the legal services market that have been repeatedly highlighted by the Competition and Markets Authority, the panel and other stakeholders. Without decisive reform, consumers will continue to face unacceptable risks and barriers.”

Chair Tom Hayhoe added: “This report lays bare a regulatory failure with devastating consequences for consumers. The SRA’s inaction over five years enabled a pattern of misconduct to escalate unchecked.

“The legal services sector must now confront the reality that its regulatory framework and oversight does not prevent harm to consumers, especially the most vulnerable.”

The panel welcomed the enforcement action but said it must be part of “a broader cultural and structural shift across the sector” – including an assessment of “how robust the Legal Services Board is at identifying risk and preventing harm to consumers”.

It said the SRA must overhaul its complaints-handling and risk-assessment processes “to ensure timely and effective action”, and introduce “clear safeguards” for clients involved in high-risk legal arrangements, including litigation funding.

More generally, regulators had to improve transparency and communication by proactively informing consumers about their rights, risks and avenues for redress.

Finally, all legal service providers and regulators “must adopt a culture that prioritises consumer outcomes and access to justice”.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Change in regulator shouldn’t make AML less of a priority

While SRA fines for AML have been climbing, many in the profession aren’t confident they will get any relief from the FCA, a body used to dealing with a highly regulated industry.


There are 17 million wills waiting to be written

The main reason cited by people who do not have a will was a lack of awareness as to how to arrange one. As a professional community, we seem to be failing to get our message across.


The case for a single legal services regulator: why the current system is failing

From catastrophic firm collapses to endemic compliance failures, the evidence is mounting that the current multi-regulator model is fundamentally broken.


Loading animation