Debt collection ABS pledges to undertake “genuine” no-win, no-fee

Print This Post

8 September 2016


Tona: claims ABS services will be different

Tona: claims debt legal services will be different

A debt collection agency has launched an alternative business structure (ABS) promising to offer “genuine” no-win, no-fee deals in an industry where it accused solicitors of being unwilling to take the rough with the smooth.

Property Debt Collection Ltd in Hertford, Hertfordshire, was given an ABS licence for PDC Law by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, effective from 1 September.

The head of legal practice is property law specialist solicitor Richard Sandler, who practised as a sole practitioner in London for 25 years until 1999.

PDC’s founder, Joe Tona, established the company in 1993 and employs over 30 staff. He said he has spun the ABS out of an in-house legal team of solicitors and paralegals and it will offer both contentious and non-contentious advice. The company reportedly collects more than £18m a year from service charge and ground rent arrears for some 140 clients, with over 80% of cases settling without legal action in 2014.

He said on the firm’s website that until now, Property Debt Collection has recommended a panel of legal providers to its clients for those cases requiring legal action. “Granted, they have operated successfully but I always felt ‘a piece of the puzzle was missing’ and that if I owned a legal firm, I would create a unique service driven by a combination of experience and technology.”

Mr Tona told Legal Futures that managing agents were dissatisfied with the deals offered by solicitors in the industry and claimed his ABS would be different. He said: “There are a lot of solicitors out there who do the work I do and a lot of them do advertise ‘no win, no fee’. But actually, is it ‘no win, no fee’? The answer is ‘no’…

“A lot of law firms say we ‘endeavour’ to do ‘no win, no fee’. You either are or you’re not. I’m saying we are. End of. You’re never going to see a bill – as long as the agent has ticked all the boxes and done everything correctly.”

Mr Tona said he had considered buying an existing law firm. “But the law firm had an issue in its background and I thought ‘I can’t take that on, I’m going to set up an ABS’. He was advised “to keep the two businesses separate, because a debt collection agency can do things a law firm can’t”.

He added: “It’s good to have two separate companies doing two separate things around the same kind of business. It works well for us. I thought long and hard about this and think I am doing the right thing.”

Tags: , , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

New right to paid leave for bereaved parents: A welcome move

Kimberley Manning DAS

This year, like many in recent years, has seen some key changes within the employment law field, with the government, trade unions and lobbyists remaining endlessly engaged in seeking to impose their interpretation of fair balance between employers and their respective workforces. Although consensus on that equilibrium can never really be achieved, sometimes there are pieces of legislative movement which are difficult to argue with regardless of your perspective: This is one of those. Published on 13 October 2017, the Parental Bereavement (Pay and Leave) Bill would provide for the first time a legal right to parents who are employed and have suffered the death of a child, a minimum of two weeks’ leave in which to grieve.

November 20th, 2017