Criminal barristers seek judicial review of LSB over QASA


Judges asked to rule on legality of barristers’ scheme

A long-awaited judicial review of the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA) has been launched by criminal law barristers against the Legal Services Board (LSB).

The legal challenge is that QASA “offends fundamental issues of justice”.

Global law firm Baker McKenzie and two eminent public law QCs are reportedly acting pro bono in the proceedings, backed by the Criminal Bar Association (CBA).

Nigel Lithman QC, the new chairman of the CBA, said: “The life of the criminal barrister is being made unsustainable by a pincer movement seeking to impose a form of regulation and fee cuts that the criminal Bar will struggle to survive.

“Following advice from eminent public law counsel, Dinah Rose QC and Tom De La Mare QC and solicitors Baker McKenzie, who all wish to act for us pro bono proceedings backed by the Criminal Bar have been issued against the LSB, with the Bar Standards Board, Solicitors Regulation Authority and ILEX Professional Standards served as interested parties.

“QASA offends fundamental issues of justice. For instance the idea an advocate can act fearlessly with one eye on his client and the other on the Judge is an ugly notion.

“With our regulators unprepared to listen to us, this is where we have ended up. The lowest point for the Criminal Bar in my professional career.

“I have explained to the Lord Chancellor how our morale has been devastated. Our regulators have substantially contributed to this malaise. What a shame.”

An LSB spokesman said: “[The] LSB will respond to [the] JR in line with established procedures and will make every effort to limit the cost exposure of the legal profession to this action on behalf of the criminal bar.”

Dr Vanessa Davies, the BSB’s director, said: “We are pleased to note the claimants now agree that the BSB is not the defendant in this matter. We have nothing further to add at this stage.”




Blog


A new route to practice rights for chartered legal executives

Following approval from the Legal Services Board in May 2022, CILEx Regulation has launched an alternative route for chartered legal executives to obtain independent practice rights.


NFTs, the courts and the role of injunctions

In May, news broke that a non-fungible token was the subject of a successful injunction made by the Singapore High Court. The NFT in question is part of the very valuable Bored Ape Yacht Club series.


Matthew Pascall

Low-value commercial cases – an achievable challenge for ATE insurers

There are many good claims brought for damages that are likely to be significantly less than twice the cost of bringing the claim. These cases present a real challenge for insurers.


Loading animation