Conveyancing instructions up by a third as completion times fall


Conveyancing: Unexpected costs more of a problem than rising costs

Conveyancing instructions rose by almost a third last year, while completion times fell, a report has found.

Seven out of 10 home buyers said they were more likely to choose a conveyancer that was 100% digital, while four out of 10 said they were happy to receive automated case updates.

While instructions rose by 32% in 2024, fall-through rates decreased by 5% and completion times also fell, by 9% since 2022.

With 69% of home buyers saying they were more likely to choose a conveyancer if they offered an entirely digital and paperless service, 42% said they would be happy to receive automated case updates.

A further 45% said they would be happy for artificial intelligence (AI) to play a role in ID and fraud checks and 39% to use chatbots for generic questions. More than a third (35%) said they would be happy for AI to draft legal documents.

Conveyancing business Smoove commissioned Censuswide to survey 1,000 home buyers over the age of 25 who moved home in the last year for the Home Movers Trends Report 2025.

Some 62% of home buyers said they experienced unexpected costs – rising to 66% for first-time buyers – and 27% said this was “one of the most frustrating parts” of the process. None said rising costs were.

Researchers said the average time taken between an offer being accepted and completion was 4.7 months, but there was “a very broad range” within this.

One in nine transactions took more than six months, and only one in five completed in under three months, despite over two-fifths of respondents believing this should be the norm.

On communication, nearly half of home buyers said there were “gaps here and there”, with only three in 10 feeling “fully informed” throughout the process. Nearly a quarter said they struggled to find out what was “going on at all”.

Researchers said technology could “go a long way” in addressing the top three concerns of clients – unforeseen delays, complicated paperwork and slow responses from conveyancers.

Matt Joy, chief growth officer at Smoove, commented: “In what are normally the biggest financial moments in a person’s life, the lack of clarity in property purchases and sales adds a completely new and preventable layer of strain for consumers.

“Central to this is the potential for spiralling, unbudgeted costs. From unexpected outlays on repairs, moving costs, surveys or searches, unplanned expenses can add up quickly and contribute to the stress and pressure on the transaction itself.

“What this research highlights is the need for greater certainty in the process and better information at the outset, allowing buyers to budget and plan more effectively.

“Resolving issues like this will help reduce delays and fall-throughs, and ultimately build more trust in the process, encouraging consumers to move more frequently.”

Smoove – which provides electronic conveyancing services to law firms and lenders, owns regulation and compliance business Legal Eye and also law firm Amity Law– was acquired by PEXA in 2023.




    Readers Comments

  • Michael Robinson says:

    Inefficient conveyancers ruin it for everyone
    These conveyancers generally over rely on technology (the purported saviour) at the expense of employing qualified personnel

    Too much of a property transaction is left to chance by listing problematic properties and through the creation of chains

    If in fact properties’ Titles were perfected before listing and full buyers’ packs created and chains avoided the process would move more smoothly

    Technology is seen as the cure because too many people don’t want the simple reform measures required as they don’t make money out of them

    Asking someone if they felt the transaction could have been quicker is the equivalent of someone saying the flight to Australia took too long.

    In other words the problems that conveyancers deal with are created by sellers and estate agents wanting to list and see rather than prepare to assure completion.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Change in regulator shouldn’t make AML less of a priority

While SRA fines for AML have been climbing, many in the profession aren’t confident they will get any relief from the FCA, a body used to dealing with a highly regulated industry.


There are 17 million wills waiting to be written

The main reason cited by people who do not have a will was a lack of awareness as to how to arrange one. As a professional community, we seem to be failing to get our message across.


The case for a single legal services regulator: why the current system is failing

From catastrophic firm collapses to endemic compliance failures, the evidence is mounting that the current multi-regulator model is fundamentally broken.


Loading animation