SRA: Section 43 orders imposed

An unqualified fee-earner who stole £569,000 from one of the country’s biggest conveyancing firms, and worked at other firms under different names before being sent to prison, has been banned from working in the profession.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has published a regulatory settlement agreement making Caprice Lindo, a former employee of O’Neil Patient, subject to a so-called section 43 order.

It said that between October and December 2013, Ms Lindo was employed by O’Neil Patient. In late 2013, she arranged for up to £569,000 of client money to be sent from the firm’s accounts to fraudsters with whom she was associated.

When a client complained, O’Neill Patient investigated and dismissed Ms Lindo.

Over the next two years, she sought employment with other firms under the alias of ‘Chloe Wilson’, before being convicted of four counts of fraud by abuse of position in April 2017.

Ms Lindo was sentenced to three and a half years imprisonment.

Meanwhile, the SRA has also issued a section 43 order to Wasim Iqbal, a trainee solicitor who was jailed for his role in the first insurance fraud convictions to involve solicitors. Two solicitors were also imprisoned, along with three other men.

Mr Iqbal was jailed for 15 months for conspiracy to defraud by fraudulent representation. At the time he worked at Eastways Solicitors.

A third section 43 order has been given to Matthew Francis, who was employed as a business development adviser and trainee solicitor at Stroud firm Winterbotham Smith & Penley from 1 March 2016 until 31 January 2017, when his contract was terminated.

He was found to have installed three personal cloud drives on to the firm’s network and stored precedents and templates onto the drives. On two occasions he denied storing any firm data on the drives. His conduct was found to be dishonest.

His current employment details are unknown.

Section 43 orders are the most that the SRA can do to stop non-solicitors operating in the profession. Under them, recipients can seek the SRA’s permission to work in the profession again.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

The working practices of property lawyers have changed little since the 19th century. Many aspects of the conveyancing process remain offline – documents are still on paper and the data entered manually. The commercial transaction process is laborious, slow and… Read More

Blog

20 June 2018

New tech on the block: what you need to know about blockchain

Blockchain. It’s been branded as the future of just about everything, and is soon expected to infiltrate all aspects of how we live our lives from banking, to tax returns to voting. But what is it, and how can it be used in property transactions?

Read More

18 June 2018

Surely no one would do this?

It’s slightly tongue-in-cheek, but let’s see if we can design a business model that is doomed to struggle and which will ensure that we miss out on the profit and cash opportunities that come with providing high-value services at high prices in a near-monopoly situation.

Read More