Conveyancing clients “not as satisfied as surveys suggest”


McLaren: Awful personal experience of conveyancing

A member of the Legal Services Consumer Panel has questioned the findings from the panel’s own research that showed consumer satisfaction with conveyancing is high.

Mark McLaren argued that there remains a lack of “meaningful change or leadership driving consumer-focused transformation” in the conveyancing market.

The panel’s annual tracker survey this year found over 90% of conveyancing clients satisfied with the outcome of their matter and over 80% satisfied with the service.

Writing on the panel’s website, Mr McLaren – also a non-executive director of the Property Ombudsman and a former senior executive at Which? – said: “But do these findings tell the whole story? For example, were over 90% satisfied with the outcome simply because they managed to buy their dream home, or avoided buying a home that was falling down?

“Were over 80% satisfied with the service from their conveyancer but dissatisfied with the process of buying their home? Isn’t one in five dissatisfied actually pretty poor?”

He questioned how the average consumer judged whether the process that led to their house purchase “really has been as good as it should have been, given their lack of technical and professional knowledge”.

Mr McLaren said: “To think that high user satisfaction, or satisfaction of outcome tell the whole story, in my view, risks complacency from conveyancers.”

He pointed to research published by the Solicitors Regulation Authority earlier this year, which showed that 37% of dissatisfied consumers said this was because the service was slow or inefficient.

“Their overall conclusion was a call for ‘clearer conveyancing information, especially for first time buyers’,” he noted.

Mr McLaren said there had been a lot of research and consultations on aspects of home-buying published this year, the most significant of which was probably the government’s response to its consultation on improving the home buying and selling process.

This started with the minister’s “very blunt assessment” that the current home buying and selling process in England was not fit for purpose.

Like the panel has argued, the government said price was not necessarily a good metric for consumers to make informed choices, saying it wanted consumers to be able to make a more informed choice of conveyancer which considered service levels, not just price.

Mr McLaren said: “It’s time to really put the consumer first, and move on from the traditional blame game and passing the buck, to secure actual improvements.

“Ten years after the ill-fated but well intentioned home information packs, and after countless research reports, I still don’t see meaningful change or leadership driving consumer-focused transformation.

“From my own personal experience, writing as a relatively well-informed consumer who has bought and sold two houses in the last three years, my recent conveyancing experience was so awful that I’m amazed 100% of consumers don’t express some dissatisfaction with both the process and the service.

“Would anyone like to tell me just how wrong I am?”

Mr McLaren did not reference legal regulators’ new transparency rules, which are to come into force in December.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

13 November 2019

The October PII renewal: Why the market changed

Since the abolition of the Solicitors Indemnity Fund, the October professional indemnity insurance renewal season has always been a challenge, but this year most law firms saw their premiums go up.

Read More

Loading animation