Conveyancers starting to cut down on ‘avoidable’ requisitions


Land Registry: Progress but more to do

Efforts to reduce the number of avoidable requisitions that the HM Land Registry has to make are working, new figures have shown.

Six months after receiving their avoidable requisition figures individually, nearly 30% of law firms and other business customers have reduced them.

The proportion of customers with an avoidable requisition rate under 1% has risen from 17% to 20%.

Andrew Robertson, HMLR’s head of customer policy and service improvement, said: “But there is more to do: the average is 4.6%. Sixteen customers have an avoidable requisition rate of 20% or more, with 28.57% being the highest; 294 customers have an avoidable rate of 10% or more.

This is soon to become public, with HMLR publishing every law firm’s avoidable requisition rate next month; currently, it just details how many requisitions firms have received each quarter.

Figures last year showed that 22% of the more than 4.4m applications received in the previous 12 months (947,000) required a requisition, each containing an average of two points, but many with more.

As well as adding on average 15 working days to the time it took for a transaction to be registered, HMLR estimated that requisitions could be costing lawyers as much as £19m, with £3.6m attributable just to getting names wrong.

It identified 30 of the most common administrative mistakes, from missing documents and witness details to incomplete or unsigned forms, as avoidable requisitions, which could be addressed before sending in the application.

Then, in May, HMLR emailed all customers who had 10 or more completed applications in the previous six month with details of their avoidable requisitions, along with links to free training and support – nearly 9,000 attendees from more than 1,640 firms have taken part in 18 online workshops so far.

Overall, since May, 29% of firms have received fewer requisitions, said Mr Robertson. “We continue to enhance our training for customers and are introducing automated checks to help improve application quality.” These aim to catch common mistakes before submission.

He added that independent research by data and market research company Savanta showed fewer customers reporting frustrations with requisition handling.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


The power of participation for trainees and apprentices

It’s important as a trainee or an apprentice to get involved in the life of your firm – even under the pressure of discovering how to navigate professional life and now the demands of the SQE.


Is it time to change how law firms view compliance?

Although COFAs often hold senior positions and play an essential role in a firm’s financial and regulatory integrity, the perception of the compliance function itself is still evolving.


From templates to culture change: Lessons from the SRA on source of funds

The SRA’s new thematic review into source of funds and wealth reveals both progress and persistent blind spots, with source-of-funds checks too often thought of as a procedural hurdle.


Loading animation