Conveyancers overtake family lawyers in complaints league table

Conveyancing complaints: sign of the times?

Conveyancing complaints: sign of the times?

Conveyancers have usurped family lawyers as the main cause of complaints to the Legal Ombudsman, its annual report has revealed.

But it also urged lawyers to think twice before pushing for formal decisions rather than accepting informal resolutions to complaints, even though the figures showed that the outcome of the former was less likely to result in the lawyer having to pay the client some money.

Publication of the report – which covers the year to 31 March 2014 – was delayed by several months because of the issues around the expenses of former chief ombudsman Adam Sampson and other financial issues at LeO.

Residential conveyancing accounted for a fifth of all complaints – up from 15% – and commercial conveyancing a further 2%, while 17% of complaints were about family law. “This may suggest an upturn in the housing market and, if it continues, could be a sign of things to come,” said the report.

As in previous years, the next most complained-about areas of law were wills and probate (13%), personal injury (10%) and litigation (9.5%).

In all, the number of ‘contacts’ received by LeO fell slightly to 69,500, of which 19,450 were complaints. After stripping out the 10,541 where the complainant had not yet used the lawyer’s complaints system or were out of time, and the 586 resolved without investigation, 8,323 complaints were formally accepted by LeO, a marginal drop on last year. But another 704 were then closed for not actually being within LeO’s jurisdiction.

The service resolved 8,055 complaints during the year, an increase on 2012/13, which LeO attributed to greater efficiency. No poor service was found in 48% of cases.

The proportion that required a formal ombudsman’s decision continued to go up, to 38%.

“In the majority of cases it is the complainant who requests a decision by an ombudsman,” the report said. “This is consistent with some evidence from other ombudsman schemes that there has been an increase in complainants’ propensity to pursue their complaints as far as possible.

“It may also reflect an increase in the number of lawyers offering reasonable remedies at the first tier, which, if true, is a positive development.”

There was a financial remedy in 40% of cases which went to an ombudsman’s decision, but in 67% of those cases resolved informally at a lower level. Most of the financial remedies were less than £1,000.

The report said: “While lawyers might be tempted to hold out for an ombudsman’s decision, they should factor in the additional time and resource they will have to put into managing the complaint and accept that the customer is likely to walk away feeling even less positive about their firm with the increased risk to their reputation that this entails.”

Only 34% of people were made aware of LeO by their lawyer – up from 27% the year before. “The increase isn’t huge, but it’s a start, and something we hope to build on.”

LeO’s costs continue to fall, with the benchmark cost per case dropping 10% to £1,950, with further cuts planned for this year.

    Readers Comments

  • Michael says:

    Seems to me LeO ought to determine which applications to accept against more stringent criteria as 48% is staggeringly bad.
    Where an offer has been made and the complainant wishes to push the complaint to conclusion should not a fee be charged?

  • A Twambley says:

    This is an unfortunate reflection of society. There is a substantial body of the public who want legal services for free… they see that the easiest way to achieve this is to complain about the service…and hope the lawyer sees it as economical just to pay up!.. We all know just how much it costs us to deal with a complaint

    Friday rant …over !

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Keeping the conversation going beyond Pride Month

As I reflect on all the celebrations of Pride Month 2024, I ask myself why there remains hesitancy amongst LGBTQ+ staff members about when it comes to being open about their identity in the workplace.

Third-party managed accounts: Your key questions answered

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has given strong indications that it is headed towards greater restrictions on law firms when it comes to handling client money.

Understanding vicarious trauma in the legal workplace

Vicarious trauma can happen to anyone who works with clients who have experienced trauma such as domestic or other violence, child abuse, sexual assault, torture or being a refugee.

Loading animation