Consumers slowly getting the message that they don’t need CMCs, says Financial Ombudsman


 

Insurance: significant number of complaints where no PPI ever existed

There has been a fall in the number of consumers using claims management companies (CMCs) to make complaints about payment protection insurance mis-selling, while some CMCs are “disappointingly lax” in the way they pursue their clients’ cases, the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) has reported.

FOS’s annual review, published yesterday, said that 60% of new cases (157,716) it received in the year to 31 March 2012 were about the sale of PPI, the highest number ever received in a year about a single financial product. In 2010/11 it was 104,597, which in turn was more than double that of the year before.

Some 69% of new cases were brought by CMCs, down from 76% in 2010/11, which FOS said “may reflect the fact that we have taken every opportunity this year to tell consumers that they do not need the help of a CMC”. Last week a row broke out over a call from consumer groups for tighter regulation of CMCs doing PPI work.

Just six CMCs accounted for 51% of cases, with the rest spread across more than 500 CMCs. FOS research found that men are marginally more likely to complain directly without using a CMC, while those aged between 25-54 are more likely than those younger or older to instruct a CMC.

FOS encourages the use of standard documentation for referring PPI disputes, but “we have again seen some CMCs taking a disappointingly lax approach to completing the questionnaire on behalf of consumers. Where a form is completed inaccurately – or not at all – we may not be able to progress the complaint.

“We have made our position on this very clear to the CMCs in question – and we have required a number of them to withdraw their complaints and to re-complete the questionnaire again in full. The quality of the information provided by CMCs to support their clients’ cases also continues to vary significantly.”

FOS added that it also receives a “significant number of cases” where, after investigation, it emerged that no PPI policy had ever been in place.

The annual review also showed a sharp increase in the number of complaints about legal expenses insurance, although at 805 (up from 635), it is a very small figure in the context of the overall number of complaints received by FOS.

 

Tags:




Blog


Why law firms are getting AI supervision wrong

The profession’s response to AI supervision failures misunderstands the nature of LLM output – there needs to be for a shift in the culture.


Beyond the PII premium – rethinking risk

Professional indemnity insurance renewal is often treated as an annual pricing exercise. But it is also a chance to show how effectively you identify, manage and mitigate risk.


The AI governance gap in law firms and why it matters now

A third of law firms are already using AI tools with no formal policy in place to govern how AI gets used, what data goes into it, or who’s accountable when something goes wrong.


Loading animation