Yehuda Solomont

Solomont: training departments “struggling to change way solicitors learn”

Confusion among solicitors is the biggest challenge to the hours-free competence regime introduced by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), a survey has suggested.

The second biggest challenge cited in a poll of 192 law firms, large and small, was that “solicitors think they won’t have to do any training”.

The survey, by compliance training specialists VinciWorks, found that only around 15% of firms believed the main problem was “solicitors’ unwillingness to change”, while less than 10% highlighted lack of communication between larger firms’ compliance and learning departments.

The new regime was introduced on a voluntary basis last year, but will become compulsory for all from 1 November 2016.

Yehuda Solomont, marketing manager at VinciWorks, said although compliance and learning departments may “ready and prepared” for the transition, they were “struggling to change the way solicitors learn”.

Mr Solomont went on: “Solicitors learn in a very hours-based way. A lot of people use the same hours-tracking system they use for other work. They’re good at what they’re used to, but this is a new way of doing things.

“The SRA is saying that you can’t just track it like that. It’s about the quality of what you’re learning.

“The SRA has some great guidance on the steps firms need to take, but I think people would like to see more examples of what training plans look like.

“A lot of firms have taken up the idea of advanced training teams. They find the most enthusiastic solicitors and run a pilot. It’s very popular and something we’re recommending, based on research.”

Mr Solomont said some small firms seemed to think that “all they have to do is tick a box” saying they’ve done their training. The hardest people to convince that they need to do training are often the senior people.”

The survey found that the most popular way firms intend to monitor compliance is through performance reviews (over 35%), followed by file reviews (20%) and only then requiring minimum hours from a verified source.

Despite their traditional conservatism, just over 50% of firms said, when asked about learning styles, that “any learning is fine”.

A surprisingly small number of firms, only around 8%, said they adopted the new competence regime last year. A much lower proposition than previous research suggested, Mr Solomont said this could be explained by the SRA’s late publication of the training declaration, in September last year, and the difficulties faced by big firms wanting to merge their compliance and training departments.

Viola Joseph, solicitor and legal learning leader at Hogan Lovells, one of the first big practices to opt into the new regime, called on solicitors last month to abandon the concept of “perfection” and concentrate instead on improving their performance.

Tags:


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

No larger firm can ignore the demands of innovation – that was the clear message from our most recent roundtable: “The law firm of the future”, sponsored by LexisNexis Enterprise Solutions. It comes in many forms, predominantly but not just technology, and is not simply a case of automating process. Expertise and process are not mutually exclusive.

Blog

15 August 2018

Get ready for the SRA’s transparency rules

You will no doubt by now be aware that the Legal Services Board has approved new rules proposed by the SRA requiring law firms to publish certain price and service information on their website.

Read More