Compliance officer banned after lying about being in office


Access: Patel said he had forgotten his pass

A compliance officer at a City law firm who pretended he was at work when he was actually working from home – and continued to lie about it – has been banned from working in the profession.

Under section 43 of the Solicitors Act 1974, Dylan Patel, who worked at Stephenson Harwood, can only work for a law firm regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) in future with the regulator’s permission.

A notice published yesterday said that Mr Patel, whose last known address was in Stanmore, North-West London, was required to work from the office on 29 November 2024.

However, he did not do so and “sought to deter a senior colleague from trying to locate him after telling her that he was on the first floor, by suggesting that he was too busy to meet with her”.

He continued to mislead colleagues in investigatory meetings on 3 and 5 December, insisting that he was present in the office on the date in question.

Mr Patel claimed he had been let into the building by a security guard as he had forgotten his pass and provided a description of this guard.

He also detailed timings of his arrival and departure from the office, where he had been sitting throughout the day and said he had connected to the firm’s wifi from his desk.

The firm fired Mr Patel for gross misconduct soon after and the SRA said it found his conduct to be dishonest.

This meant that it was “undesirable for him to be involved in a legal practice without the SRA’s prior approval”.




Blog


Mazur: a symptom not a cause?

If Mazur is a symptom, what does it mean for the underlying health of our civil justice system: the ‘finest legal system in the world’?


Cross-generation collaboration: the key to in-house legal tech adoption

In-house legal function leaders will increasingly have to evolve their thinking on how to manage multigenerational teams containing differing levels of technological expertise.


AI and law firm risk – the view of professional indemnity insurers

In considering law firm applications for cover, many insurers will expect to see evidence of how firms are adapting to AI and preparing for the future.


Loading animation