Comparison website ramps up offering in time with Law Superstore deal


Boothman: site aimed at reasonably sophisticated users

A legal comparison website has gone live with its bespoke platform with the demand for such services in flux.

The relaunch of MyLegalAdviser comes in the wake of The Law Superstore being sold last month to Reallymoving.

It is the brainchild of Alex Boothman, a one-time private client solicitor at Berkeley Law, which is now part of Irwin Mitchell.

He said the investment by Reallymoving “could help raise expectations” of what comparison websites might offer law firms.

MyLegalAdviser has around 200 solicitors signed up to it. Users enter details of their case, which are then sent to the panel. Interested lawyers have 24 hours to ask any questions and submit a quote.

The client is then provided with a shortlist of up to three of those who did do: the lowest quote, the quote from the lawyer rated best by other users, and the first lawyer to respond to the request.

They are also told how many quotes were sent, along with the highest, lowest and average figures.

If the client decides to go with one them, the retainer is arranged through the site, which takes a 10% cut from the fee.

Mr Boothman said the underlying algorithm was programmed to favour fixed fees over hourly rates, while any lawyer who does not stick to their quote gets a bad review, with a knock-on impact on their overall rating and then their ability to get on the shortlist.

He said it was important for consumers to have “an element of price comparison” but argued that MyLegalAdviser put other considerations before them too.

He acknowledged that “lawyers are quite resistant to this type of site” as they fear both cheapening their brand and being forced into a race to the bottom on price

This was why MyLegalAdviser aimed to be a “mid-market” brand aimed at “reasonably sophisticated users”. The total value of enquiries to date was around £750,000 and Mr Boothman said “a good proportion” were converted.

He added future plans for the site included doing due diligence on the client as part of the process.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


A new route to practice rights for chartered legal executives

Following approval from the Legal Services Board in May 2022, CILEx Regulation has launched an alternative route for chartered legal executives to obtain independent practice rights.


NFTs, the courts and the role of injunctions

In May, news broke that a non-fungible token was the subject of a successful injunction made by the Singapore High Court. The NFT in question is part of the very valuable Bored Ape Yacht Club series.


Matthew Pascall

Low-value commercial cases – an achievable challenge for ATE insurers

There are many good claims brought for damages that are likely to be significantly less than twice the cost of bringing the claim. These cases present a real challenge for insurers.


Loading animation