City law firm in dash to add artificial intelligence to software robots

Matthew-Whalley BLP

Whalley: intelligent RPA robots on “near-term spectrum”

Global law firm Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP) is in discussions with a specialist provider of artificial intelligence (AI) computing to improve its ability to search documents in the field of commercial contracts.

The move parallels a growing awareness of the potential of robotic process automation (RPA) to automate process workflow routines by large commercial businesses. The Co-op Bank is reportedly using RPA to make debt collection decisions and Co-op Energy uses it to process thousands of new customer applications.

While not AI in the futuristic sense of self-aware robots, or even machines that can make sense of unstructured information, the term RPA is used to describe sophisticated process robots built using computer code, similar to the ‘agents’ that were previously common in the world of process automation. But rather than have to be written laboriously to perform narrow tasks, today’s RPA robots can read, write and report data across different systems within an organisation.

BLP’s head of legal risk consultancy, Matthew Whalley, who helps clients identify and mitigate legal risks, told Legal Futures that the next big advance in AI for the legal market was not just searching and finding a list of relevant documents, but extracting the information and data within documents.

He said: “If you can get a bit of software, whether we call it a robot or a routine, that can index through 10,000 documents, identify the 100 documents that are relevant… and identify five data points from each document… actually what you’re talking about is a very advanced and quite a revolutionary software routine.

“That core ability to extract and report data from documents is the key thing that has actually been missing from search technology and review technology for the last 20 years.”

He said this use of AI was “on the near-term spectrum”. While much discussion of AI was what might happen in 20 years’ time, “for now the real challenge is that ability to extract and report on key data points and it’s really hard to do, especially on a large set of unstructured data, which is what a big body of contracts is.”

He added that RPA and potential associated AI was “quite an exciting technology, particularly if you are in the legal industry and particularly if you are involved in legal risk analytics and contract risk analytics, and you want to find solutions to sifting through hundreds of thousands of documents and reporting on the things that actually matter without involving thousands of man-hours”.

Mr Whalley concluded: “As RPA advances, it has a role in any organisation that has repeatable processes, that employs people to do repeat work. If you invest the time in training, or encoding your robot… [it] will work tirelessly throughout the night, every night, 365 days of the year and never deviate or make any mistakes. It means you can free up your people to move up the value chain rather than just trap them in boring, repetitive, menial tasks.”

He confirmed that BLP was negotiating for the services of a firm “that delivers AI, or really good search, in contract governance and analytics”.

At the end of last year, BLP built its first internal contracts robot and said it expected to build more robots for clients in the coming years, which would cover tasks such as processing contracts, monitoring payments against contractual terms, and improving the accuracy of standard contracting negotiations.

Earlier this month, we reported that Riverview Law had entered a partnership with Liverpool University to apply computer science expertise in AI to legal services. Riverview’s chief executive, Karl Chapman, is also chairing a technology advisory council set up to work with IBM and others to shape the development into the professions of ‘cognitive’ decision tools such as IBM Watson. Watson claims to be able to find “answers and insights locked away in volumes of data”.

A report last year by Jomati predicted that robots and AI will dominate legal practice within 15 years, perhaps leading to the “structural collapse” of law firms.


    Readers Comments

  • i agree this is close, if not already ere. Check out diligenceengine for example.

  • Or indeed RAVN Systems, which I believe is slightly more relevant in this case…

  • Seal Software delivers this technology today, first locating/consolidating all existing contracts across the enterprise, extracting 50+ terms per contract, AND enabling users to create policies on the fly to extract any new terms from the unstructured contract language whenever needed. Finding the 100 documents out of 10,000 as stated is accomplished in seconds or minutes, not days or weeks.

  • “Structural collapse” may be a dramatic way of expressing it but I do think that many firms will just find that their work dries up, as other firms are better than them at all sorts of things from using “AI” . Areas might include research, basic document preparation, initial client call processing, as with some insurance firms already and “fuzzy logic” about how to progress matters, rather than inflexible case flows.

  • This report / article is not surprising, but I thoroughly enjoyed reading it.

    Absolutely Richard. Touche. It’s here alright, now.

    I believe Jomati was very conservative. We will see AI and Robots dominating the legal world by 2020, imho. The new arms race is AI in society and the business world therefore it is inevitable it will be so in the legal world too. There will not be a ‘structural collapse’, merely a continuous ebbing away of those law firms that don’t enter the race in the next few years…

    Chrissie Lightfoot
    Author of ‘Tomorrow’s Naked Lawyer: NewTech, NewHuman, NewLaw – How to be successful 2015 to 2045’ (published Dec 2014)

  • Bekki says:

    For more details on this project there is a BBC Broadcast Tech Tent with Matt Whalley and RAVN Systems:

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Keeping the conversation going beyond Pride Month

As I reflect on all the celebrations of Pride Month 2024, I ask myself why there remains hesitancy amongst LGBTQ+ staff members about when it comes to being open about their identity in the workplace.

Third-party managed accounts: Your key questions answered

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has given strong indications that it is headed towards greater restrictions on law firms when it comes to handling client money.

Understanding vicarious trauma in the legal workplace

Vicarious trauma can happen to anyone who works with clients who have experienced trauma such as domestic or other violence, child abuse, sexual assault, torture or being a refugee.

Loading animation