Grant: Maximising opportunities for CILEx practitioners

The Legal Services Board (LSB) has approved an application by CILEx Regulation to license alternative business structures, which will now go to the Lord Chancellor for a final decision.

If successful, the regulator of chartered legal executives will become the sixth ABS licensing authority.

In its decision notice, the LSB said CILEx Regulation’s application met the statutory requirement to promote the regulatory objectives set out in the Legal Services Act 2007.

“For example, CILEx Regulation’s application was clear that protection and promotion of the interests of consumers and the public is central to its regulatory arrangements. This comes through in its code of conduct and risk-based approach to authorisation and supervision of entities.”

The oversight regulator said it had looked particularly closely at CILEx Regulation’s capacity and capability to authorise ABS, and its approach to risk, and was satisfied on both counts with what it saw.

As we reported in April, the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Burnett – one of the LSB’s statutory consultees when considering an application of this nature – said that while he was “broadly content” with it, he was concerned that CILEx Regulation would not require the ABS’s head of legal practice (HOLP) to be a manager of the firm, and that only one manager of the ABS was required to be a lawyer.

However, the LSB accepted CILEx Regulation’s reassurance on these issues.

The LSB said CILEx Regulation had confirmed that it would expect HOLPs to be managers, and would use its “risk framework to flag structures that did not have the HOLP as a manager, which would make them less likely to be authorised”.

In its decision notice, the LSB said: “Whilst the licensing rules of some approved regulators do require the HOLP to be a manager, the Solicitors Regulation Authority and Council for Licenced Conveyancers licensing rules do not.

“After careful consideration of the LCJ’s views and CILEx Regulation’s response, the LSB concluded that it is reasonable that licensing authorities have rules that reflect the type of ABS model they are most likely to authorise and do not put in place unnecessary mandatory licensing restrictions.”

On the question of lawyer managers, Lord Burnett warned of the dangers of “improper influence” by non-authorised owners and managers, pointing to the example of the Bar Standards Board (BSB).

The LSB said the BSB did not have rules that required more than one manager to be a lawyer, but noted that an entity would be “more appropriate for the BSB to regulate” if at least 75% of owners and managers were authorised.

“However, none of the other regulators designated as licensing authorities have licensing rules or policy statements in place as to the number or proportion of authorised persons as managers or owners.

“CILEx Regulation’s representations stated that it will only look to regulate entities that present a low risk business ownership model, limiting the opportunities for undue influence.

“It expects the majority of its applications for ABS to come from sole practitioners who want to bring additional skills and investment into their business, so its rules and policies need to allow it the flexibility to regulate this small type of ABS.

“Taking all of this into account, the LSB was assured that CILEx Regulation’s risk framework will identify in the authorisation process any ownership structures that increase the risk of undue influence from non-authorised owners.”

CILEx Regulation applied to regulate ABSs in September last year. The Lord Chancellor, David Gauke, now has 90 days to decide on the application.

Millicent Grant, the president of CILEx , said: “The LSB’s decision is another step toward maximising opportunities for CILEx practitioners.

“Being able to set up legal businesses in partnership with others will further diversify the market, and over time will give more choice to the public on where they seek their legal services.”


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

No larger firm can ignore the demands of innovation – that was the clear message from our most recent roundtable: “The law firm of the future”, sponsored by LexisNexis Enterprise Solutions. It comes in many forms, predominantly but not just technology, and is not simply a case of automating process. Expertise and process are not mutually exclusive.

Blog

15 August 2018

Get ready for the SRA’s transparency rules

You will no doubt by now be aware that the Legal Services Board has approved new rules proposed by the SRA requiring law firms to publish certain price and service information on their website.

Read More