Cheap is not cheerful, as only one in 10 choose conveyancer on price


for sale

More than half found conveyancers through estate agents

The proportion of people selecting their conveyancer on price has fallen to only one in 10, a survey of 5,400 home movers has shown. The same survey found that only three years ago 20% of clients chose the cheapest.

The survey also found consumers much more willing than before to trust estate agents for recommendations. More than half (51%) chose their estate agent’s recommended conveyancer in 2015, compared to 38% the previous year.

The annual Home Moving Trends survey, carried out by the Property Academy in partnership with tmgroup, contacted consumers across the UK who had moved house in the past 12 months.

It found that, in contrast to previous results, the young were no longer the most likely to use the cheapest conveyancer.

“Among the more surprising findings was that none of the home movers aged 21-29 told us that price was important to them,” researchers said.

“In fact seven out of 10 respondents in this age group told us that price was ‘really not important’. Furthermore, none of the respondents in this age group actually chose the conveyancer that quoted the cheapest fee.”

Ben Harris, sales and marketing director at tmgroup, said: “It couldn’t be clearer that potential clients, even younger ones, want to see more from you than low prices and given that, for example, you would need to increase your sales volume by 67% to account for the shortfall in profit by slashing your prices by 20%, we strongly advise that you consider holding or increasing your fees rather than reducing them.”

Although more than half of home movers accepted estate agents’ recommendations, the survey found that it was “hit or miss” whether they would go on to recommend the firm they used.

Almost a third (30%) of this group gave their firms a nine out of 10 satisfaction rating, but a higher proportion (37%) gave them less than six out of 10.

Even worse were the satisfaction ratings from the 8% of home movers who found a conveyancer online. More than half of them would not recommend the firm and a quarter gave their conveyancer a score of zero.

In contrast, 55% of those who went with a friend’s choice gave the firm either full marks or nine out of 10. However, the proportion of home movers who accepted the advice of friends was sharply down, falling from 21% in 2014 to 12%.

The survey underlined previous findings that clients are looking for good communicators, with 80% saying this was the most important quality they were looking for.

They wanted updates whether or not their conveyancer actually had anything to report. Seven out of 10 consumers wanted updates once a week, compared to 22% who only wanted to hear from their conveyancer when there was something they needed to know.

Views on the means of communications were little changed in the latest survey, with 60% preferring email and almost all the rest preferring the phone.

Tags:




    Readers Comments

  • Andrew Woolley says:

    Yes, except all conveyancing is cheap compared to comparables.

    Thus, clients do not see the cost as that much of a big deal.

  • Ben Aslet says:

    This is a really interesting article, at LEAP we are receiving the same from those practising conveyancing. Firms that are generating more conveyancing work are doing so by providing fast and accurate services with clear, regular communications to their clients. In such a competitive market it is about so much more than price.

    For most people purchasing a home is the largest investment they will make and home movers want their solicitor to be on hand to help guide them through this important process. A successful conveyancer must carry out their work efficiently and put clear and regular communication with the client at the heart of what they do.

  • Timothy Higham says:

    The most grateful clients we see are those who:
    1. know they have a seriously good lawyer, who knows property law backwards (i.e rare)
    2. as a result, they can face down any legal issue, and keep the deal moving along very fast
    3. who has more time therefore to keep client and estate agent updated
    4. who secures a fast deal, and without any legal error – nothing worse than a legal issue on any resale, or remortgaging, or even a knock at the door if their lawyer missed something.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Retrospective or not retrospective, that is the question

As the debate heats up over the Litigation Funding Agreements (Enforceability) Bill, it is crucial to understand what is the true vice in retrospective legislation.


Harnessing the balance of technology and human interaction

In today’s legal landscape, finding the delicate balance between driving efficiency via use of technology and providing a personalised service is paramount to success.


AI’s legal leap: transforming law practice with intelligent tech

Just like in numerous other industries, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in the legal sector is proving to be a game-changer.


Loading animation