Kershaw: important step for consumer choice

Chartered legal executives are to have full rights to practise independently after the Lord Chancellor approved their bid to handle probate and conveyancing work without the supervision of a solicitor.

Along with approvals last year of rule changes on litigation, advocacy and immigration activities, it means chartered legal executives will be on an equal footing with solicitors and barristers.

While some chartered legal executives already run their own practices, these can only operate in unreserved areas of work, but there will no limitations when the order introducing the change is presented to Parliament later this year.

Chris Grayling was approving the recommendation of the Legal Services Board in December.

Alan Kershaw, chairman of the regulator, ILEX Professional Standards (IPS), said: “This is an important step for consumer choice and for recognising the standards IPS expects of those we regulate.

“Consumers expect their lawyers to be well trained in their area of specialism and to have a means of recourse if they are not satisfied. These orders help ensure this, and we will now work with our colleagues in Westminster to ensure their smooth passage through Parliament.”

CILEx president Stephen Gowland added: “Consumers can be confident that chartered legal executive-run businesses will provide a competitive and high-quality service, and the public will have greater choice over who they get their legal services from.

“Current law firms will also be able to deploy CILEx members to their full potential, and not be bound up in red tape with unnecessary sign-off requirements. As the legal services industry is changing, these orders will help make us more resilient, innovative and diverse.”

IPS expects to begin accepting applications for authorisation in the summer. It is working with the Ministry of Justice on orders to put client protection measures in place, including a compensation fund and intervention arrangements. These are expected to be approved by Parliament later this year, after which CILEx authorised practitioners will be able to set up fully in business on their own.

IPS will also apply to the Legal Services Board in due course to be able to license alternative business structures (ABSs).

As reported last week, Mr Grayling also approved an application by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales to become a regulator of probate services and licensing authority for ABSs. He further approved the applications of the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys and Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys for their joint regulator, the Intellectual Property Regulation Board, to become an ABS licensing authority.

Tags:


    Readers Comments

  • This is the second attack this month on traditional practising Solicitors work. Law firms must reconsider its methods of doing business, marketing and ways of retaining clients. I am speaking at an IQPC conference this month on customer/ client loyalty and retention.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

The working practices of property lawyers have changed little since the 19th century. Many aspects of the conveyancing process remain offline – documents are still on paper and the data entered manually. The commercial transaction process is laborious, slow and… Read More

Blog

20 June 2018

New tech on the block: what you need to know about blockchain

Blockchain. It’s been branded as the future of just about everything, and is soon expected to infiltrate all aspects of how we live our lives from banking, to tax returns to voting. But what is it, and how can it be used in property transactions?

Read More

18 June 2018

Surely no one would do this?

It’s slightly tongue-in-cheek, but let’s see if we can design a business model that is doomed to struggle and which will ensure that we miss out on the profit and cash opportunities that come with providing high-value services at high prices in a near-monopoly situation.

Read More