Chambers “must publish” data on sexual orientation and religion


Pride: New reporting rules on sexual orientation

The Legal Services Board (LSB) has approved a new rule requiring chambers to include sexual orientation and religion in the diversity data they publish on their websites, whether or not all of their barristers agree.

The LSB said better reporting of data by chambers and other organisations employing barristers “could assist in encouraging the recruitment and retention of diverse workforces”.

The rule change would bring sexual orientation and religion or belief into line with the reporting of other protected characteristics by chambers.

The Bar Standards Board (BSB), which applied for the rule change with the support of the Bar Council, said the existing rule meant that “almost none” of the summaries produced by chambers covered sexual orientation and religion or belief.

The LSB said it welcomed the BSB’s application, which was “intended to assist in enabling the BSB to have a greater understanding of the diversity profile of the profession”.

The oversight regulator said the change might not have a “great impact” in the BSB’s understanding of diversity in the profession because individual barristers already gave details of religion or belief through MyBar, the online system through which they renew their practising certificates.

“However, the LSB considers that greater reporting by chambers and BSB entities is likely to improve publicly available data about chambers and entities which could assist in encouraging the recruitment and retention of diverse workforces by chambers and entities.

“The LSB also understands the BSB’s intention to promote and embed the principles of equality and diversity within chambers and entities through the publication of diversity data.”

The LSB said the BSB introduced the existing rules in its 2012 Handbook.

“At that time it was felt that imposing additional restrictions relating to the publication of sexual orientation and religious belief data would promote the disclosure of diversity data, in light of the sensitivity around the disclosure of this type of data and the Bar’s lack of familiarity with diversity monitoring.”

The BSB launched a consultation on the issue in April 2018. Each of the eight organisations which responded to the consultation backed the change, along with 18 of the 31 individuals.

The LSB said some of the 13 individuals opposing the change thought it would be “an intrusion into privacy”.

The LSB went on: “The BSB identified some of the potential risks associated with the proposal. In particular it highlighted the possibility of political attention and protests associated with chambers and BSB entities publishing the religion of their members. It concluded that in today’s climate such protests were unlikely.”

The BSB said the change would still protect the identity of individual barristers by “prohibiting disclosure in cases where individuals might be identified by requiring consent to publish where fewer than 10 people have a certain characteristic within chambers or BSB entities”.

The LSB said it was satisfied that the new rule maintained “appropriate measures” to protect the identity of individuals where they might be identifiable.

The LSB noted that the BSB was considering “producing examples of situations where non-publication may be appropriate even in circumstances where there is no risk of individuals being identified” and said it would welcome the guidance.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

21 November 2019

Analysing the October PII renewal

Our clients that renewed during this period recorded an average fee increase of 7.5%. The partner size segment that experienced the largest growth in percentage terms was 11-25 partners, at 11.3%.

Read More

Loading animation