McGowan: many barristers will still be hesitant to speak publicly about live cases

Barristers can now speak to the press about their cases, after the Bar’s Code of Conduct was changed.

The end to the rule prohibiting barristers from expressing personal opinion in any public statement, to the press or otherwise, in relation to any work they have been undertaking finally brings them in line with solicitor-advocates, who have been able to give their own views since 2007.

Instead the Bar Standards Board (BSB) – which said the change had caused no problems for solicitor-advocates – is publishing guidance to assist barristers in determining in which, if any, circumstances it would be appropriate to express any personal opinion, bearing in mind their obligations around acting in the client’s best interests, maintaining independence, upholding trust and confidence in the profession, and preserving client confidentiality.

Approving the change last week, the Legal Services Board (LSB) said: “The BSB acknowledged in its application that there is a risk that barristers could make comments in the media that will undermine confidence in the conduct and outcome of an individual case.

“It believes that this will be mitigated by the new guidance and the general Code of Conduct obligations of not engaging in conduct that is dishonest or otherwise discreditable, prejudicial to the administration of justice or likely to diminish public confidence will still apply and be relevant when deciding whether to make comments to the media.

“The LSB agrees with the BSB‘s assertion that this rules change should allow barristers to exercise their professional judgement in a more outcomes-focused way and that it is consistent with the regulatory objectives for barristers to be able to comment in public where they believe that this is justified, appropriate and in their client’s best interests.”

Bar Council chair Maura McGowan QC said: “It is right that barristers who wish to speak to the media, in appropriate circumstances, should be able to do so. However, despite this change, it is likely, perfectly appropriately, that many barristers will be hesitant to speak publicly about live cases in which they are instructed. We hope that the media will understand and respect those who do take that position.”

Tags:


    Readers Comments

  • Thus is fine but there must be certainty. No Barrister will say a word if everything they say is to be vetted by the BSB with a view to a prosecution under para 301.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

The working practices of property lawyers have changed little since the 19th century. Many aspects of the conveyancing process remain offline – documents are still on paper and the data entered manually. The commercial transaction process is laborious, slow and… Read More

Blog

20 June 2018

New tech on the block: what you need to know about blockchain

Blockchain. It’s been branded as the future of just about everything, and is soon expected to infiltrate all aspects of how we live our lives from banking, to tax returns to voting. But what is it, and how can it be used in property transactions?

Read More

18 June 2018

Surely no one would do this?

It’s slightly tongue-in-cheek, but let’s see if we can design a business model that is doomed to struggle and which will ensure that we miss out on the profit and cash opportunities that come with providing high-value services at high prices in a near-monopoly situation.

Read More