BSB urged to take over ‘fit and proper person’ tests from inns


Inns of Court: Memorandum of understanding with BSB

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has been urged to take control from the Inns of Court of deciding whether someone is ‘fit and proper’ to be called to the Bar.

Under its Future Bar Training reform plan, the BSB would set out the manner in which an inn would assess whether someone is fit and proper to be called.

This will be through a memorandum of understanding between the BSB, the Council of the Inns of Court and the inns covering the education and training of barristers.

However, in response to the BSB’s consultation on its draft new training rules, the Legal Services Consumer Panel has called for the BSB to be responsible for the check.

It said: “We believe that the BSB should have a clear and direct regulatory responsibility for the register of barristers.

“In our opinion, this is a regulatory function, and it is common for regulators to carry out such checks. [We] note that the Solicitors Regulation Authority carries out the ‘character and suitability’ assessment of persons applying to become solicitors.”

In an earlier consultation in October 2017, the BSB raised the question of whether it should continue to delegate responsibility for these checks to the Inns, and the consumer panel outlined its opposition at that stage too.

But in a policy statement published in March, the BSB said it would maintain the existing position as part of its wider decision on the role of the inns under the new training regime.

The statement said: “In order to achieve proportionate regulatory oversight, there should be a continuing partnership with the Inns of Court but with strengthened quality assurance/compliance arrangements in place.

“This oversight role will continue through the specification by the BSB of pre-call and preauthorisation requirements in the BSB Handbook.”

The BSB will, however, in future require a ‘standard’ Disclosure and Barring Service check at the point of call.

The next stage will be for the BSB to submit its final draft of the new rules to the Legal Services Board for approval.

The BSB has not published a summary of responses to the 2017 consultation, or explained the reasons for all of the decisions it took as a result, preferring instead just to put out policy statements declaring the way forward.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

18 October 2019

Will your staff have confidence in your compliance officers?

The introduction of the SRA Standards and Regulations on 25 November 2019 will see new issues coming into focus for you and your firms over the reporting of serious breaches to the SRA.

Read More

Loading animation