BSB to use ‘marginalised by race’ as way to describe minority groups


Diversity: BSB looking to be more specific on ethnicity

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) is to encourage those it regulates to use terms like ‘racially minoritised’ and ‘marginalised by race’ if they have to use collective language to describe ethnicity.

It said it was aware that unacceptable terms such as ‘coloured’ may still sometimes be heard at the Bar.

The BSB said the paper on its approach to racial terminology, published last week, reflected a need to establish “more granular and appropriate language that would allow us to use our research and data more effectively to understand the challenges and experiences of people from a range of ethnicities at the Bar”.

It also wanted to be clear to the profession about what it considered to be good practice when discussing race and “to encourage chambers and entities to do the same, especially as we are aware that uncertainty about the kinds of language to use may deter people from engaging in the necessary discussions”.

The paper acknowledged the “deeply subjective and personal” nature of the issue, such that no single term was likely to be universally accepted.

Using collective terms to describe different ethnicities was “unhelpful and insensitive”, however.

“As a risk-based regulator, we acknowledge that using the right language is key to understanding the experiences of people from a range of ethnic and racial groups at the Bar.

“We will, where possible, disaggregate data into specific ethnic and racial groups, particularly when conducting research or drafting reports.”

It pledged not to use acronyms like BAME (Black, Asian and minority ethnic) or BME, saying they could be “vague and unrelatable” and did not help to understand the individual challenges faced by specific ethnic or racial groups.

“Where the grouping together of ethnicities is unavoidable, we will spell out the acronym or initialism,” it went on.

The BSB said it would not use terms “that are offensive or unacceptable (for example ‘coloured’ is a term that has been unacceptable for some time, but we have been made aware may still sometimes be used at the Bar)”.

It would also not define people in a negative way, such as ‘non-white’ or ‘non-traditional background’.

“These terms can be deeply offensive, suggesting that people do not belong by ‘othering’ them. Rather than using cross-cutting terms like ‘non-traditional background’, where intersectionality exists, we will spell it out.”

But where it was impossible to avoid collective language, the BSB said it would be guided by the context and content of the text.

“For example, if we are discussing the experience of a large community of different ethnic groups, we might use the term ‘racially minoritised’.”

In doing so, the regulator explained, it was “referring to communities that have been marginalised through the differential allocation of status and power, identified by their racial or ethnic group”.

Other terms the BSB may use “where more specific language is not applicable” included ‘racialised communities’, ‘Black and minoritised’, ‘minoritised communities’, ‘marginalised by race’, and ‘communities experiencing racial inequality’.

The government’s approach is not to use either BAME or BME “because they emphasise certain ethnic minority groups… and exclude others”. It uses ‘ethnic minorities’ to refer to all ethnic groups except the white British group.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Building a brand – lessons from Cazoo

Building a brand takes more than money – just ask Alex Chesterman, the founder of ill-fated online used car retailer Cazoo, which collapsed into administration last month.


The future of organic search for law firms

In a significant turn of events, thousands of internal Google search API documents have recently been leaked, shedding light on the intricate workings of the search giant’s ranking algorithms.


Commercial real estate: The impact of AI and climate change

There is no doubt climate change poses one of the most complex challenges for the legal industry; nonetheless, our research shows firms are adapting.


Loading animation