BSB: No need for “anxiety” over barrister training standards


Barrister training: Students well informed about prospects

The evidence “does not support anxiety about standards” for qualifying as a barrister, the Bar Standards Board (BSB) has said.

The regulator also said the number of students enrolling on Bar training courses was up by 10% in 2023/24 compared to three years earlier, and warned that this “may lead to a lower proportion of students going on to pupillage”.

A paper presenting its annual training report to the BSB board last week said some of its “key stakeholders” had expressed the concern that standards were at risk.

“In particular, they say that too many students are entering the vocational component of training (post-graduate Bar courses) with limited chance of success in passing the Bar course and in obtaining pupillage.

“They argue that, as well as exploiting students, this negatively impacts student experience for all, and standards of training are suffering as a result.”

But the BSB said the evidence did not support “anxiety about standards”.

It explained: “It is not the BSB’s role to limit ambition and demand, provided that prospective students are well-informed about their prospects.

“The Legal Service Board’s statutory guidance on education and training requires that regulators place no inappropriate direct or indirect restrictions on the numbers entering the profession.

“We provide information on our website for prospective students to enable them to understand their chances of success, both in the vocational Bar courses, and in progression to pupillage.

“Success rates for pupillage applications show that in the 2020/21 cohort of students, slightly under half of home-based course graduates (46%) have moved onto pupillage.

“Many overseas students enrol on the Bar courses for reasons other than progressing to pupillage; our latest statistics show that overseas students now form the majority.”

The regulator said records showed that most students (around eight in 10) passed the former Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC). The BSB was monitoring data for the new courses introduced after the training reforms in 2020, but the first cohorts had not yet exhausted their resit opportunities.

Further, a review of Bar training providers’ admission arrangements, published last month, showed they were continuing to meet the BSB’s requirements.

Asssessment standards were “rigorous”, both in the core subjects marked centrally and the skills subjects marked locally, and there was a new framework to ensure consistent standards of advocacy training in pupillage.

The number of enrollments on the course rose by nearly 10% in three years to 2,406 in 2023/24, around half of whom were originally based overseas.

Meanwhile, the proportion of UK Bar students from minority ethnic backgrounds fell last year from 47% to 42% – but still higher than the peak of almost 37% in the final years of the BPTC.

On cost, the BSB calculated the average for the new Bar course as £15,700 in 2023/24, more than £4,000 less than would have been charged by the BPTC course when adjusted for inflation.

Fees paid across all course providers rose from around £29m in 2019/20 to £34m in 2022/23, and more than £37.5m in 2023/24.

The BSB said an increase in student numbers had “largely made up for the decrease in tuition fees in terms of the total revenue generated by Bar training courses across all providers”.

The proportion of students with a lower second-class degree has increased in recent years – it was 22% in 2023/24.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


GEO – the impact of AI on digital marketing for law firms

GEO represents the biggest change in online business generation that I can remember. You cannot afford to stick with the same old engine optimisation techniques.


What the law can learn from fintech’s onboarding revolution

Client onboarding has always been slow. It’s not just about the paperwork and manual workflows; it’s also about those long AML checks and verifications.


Civil enforcement – progress at last with CJC report

‘When do I get my money?’ is a question that litigators acting for successful parties are used to fielding. The value of judgments is of course in the recovery made.


Loading animation