BSB fires warning shot over SRA regulation

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

11 April 2010


Happy client: detailed rules may be needed to ensure consumer confidence

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has fired a warning shot across the bows of its solicitor counterpart, warning that “there will be instances where outcomes-based regulation is likely to be inadequate on its own, even if supplemented by guidance”.

Responding to the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA) consultation Achieving the right outcomes, which set out the SRA’s strategy to introduce outcomes-focused regulation, the BSB said that “simplifying and clarifying existing regulation should not mean that it should be any less rigorous”.

It continued: “The BSB remains concerned that outcomes-based principles may be too vague to deal with certain scenarios unless supported by at least some binding rules.  Without such rules there is a risk that ‘simplification’ is merely a watering down of differing levels of regulation found to be appropriate for different regulators.”

The SRA has indicated that despite intending to reduce the size of the Solicitors Code of Conduct as part of the move towards outcomes-focused regulation, it will retain detailed rules where necessary to protect consumers.

The BSB response said that while flexibility can be helpful, the importance attached to process should not be underestimated. “For example, requirements as to behaviour of lawyers and employees, and others are outcomes which can be achieved only over a longer period of experience in operating the new regime. This is important for consumer confidence.

“Whilst outcomes may be set at a high level, there is still the question of how they are actually achieved.  A more prescriptive approach should be taken where there is good reason to do so. It is important to ensure that it can be demonstrated how the outcomes might be secured in practice.”

Tags: , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Small claims 2013 v 2018: What has changed?

Brett Dixon APIL

Successive governments have considered increasing the small claims limit for personal injury claims, at the behest of the insurance industry lobby, from £1,000 to £5,000. But the lower limit remains unchanged because, so far, evidence and reasoning have prevailed. The last time the government tried to implement an increase was in 2013 when it concluded that it would keep the issue under consideration for implementation “when appropriate”. Nothing has happened to suppose a small claims limit of £5,000 is any more “appropriate” in 2018 than it was in 2013.

January 15th, 2018