Barristers warned over social media misuse “at all times”

Social media: Inappropriate comments warning

Barristers who use social media inappropriately will face disciplinary action even if they believe they are doing so in their private capacity, the Bar Standards Board has warned.

In newly issued guidance, the regulator also advised barristers to avoid getting drawn into “heated debates or arguments” online.

The extent to which regulators should sanction lawyers’ actions in their private lives has been a live issue of late, such as in the case of a senior finance partner at City giant Hogan Lovells rebuked for discriminating against his children’s pregnant nanny.

Meanwhile, a Bar disciplinary tribunal recently rejected an unregistered (ie non-practising) barrister’s argument that a “seriously offensive” tweet he sent was entirely unrelated to his professional role as a barrister and it was not the BSB’s role to police his private life.

The tribunal said anyone clicking on his name on the tweet was taken to his website, which stated that he was a barrister.

The guidance made clear that it applied to barristers in both a professional and personal capacity, “since the inherently public nature of the Internet means that anything you publish online may be read by anyone and could be linked back to your status as a barrister”.

It continued: “Remember that you are bound by Core Duty 5 not to behave in a way which is likely to diminish the trust and confidence which the public places in you or the profession at all times [the BSB’s emphasis].

Unregistered barristers should also bear this guidance in mind when using social media; as members of the profession, they are expected to conduct themselves in an appropriate manner and are also subject to certain core duties and other rules.”

The guidance cautioned that comments designed to “demean or insult” were likely to diminish public trust and confidence in the profession.

“It is also advisable to avoid getting drawn into heated debates or arguments. Such behaviour could compromise the requirements for barristers to act with honesty and integrity (CD3) and not to unlawfully discriminate against any person (CD8).

“You should always take care to consider the content and tone of what you are posting or sharing. Comments that you reasonably consider to be in good taste may be considered distasteful or offensive by others.”

    Readers Comments

  • Min Grob says:

    This is a good step forward but does not go far enough. It needs to include barristers who ‘ like’ or share demeaning or insulting posts from anonymous ‘troll’ accounts, as well as those who share disparaging and vilifying information behind locked accounts, so that the person targeted is not aware of what is being said about them, but others are.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Success in-house – what people don’t tell you about how to get there

TV dramas have made many people think that the legal profession consists of heroes (or villains) in high-flying firms or public prosecution. In reality, nearly a quarter of solicitors work in-house.

The ‘soft landing’ growth strategy for law firms

Increasing demand for ‘hot’ areas of law inspires opportunist law firms to hire more specialists to add to their firepower – the right people at the right time. Yet this is a big ask.

The changing landscape of legal education and online learning

Learning has come a long way since I qualified. There’s a lot more knowledge available about how students learn and how different students learn differently. It’s not one-size-fits-all anymore.

Loading animation