Barristers move towards ABS, survey says

Deech: growing interest in direct access “good news” for consumers

Nearly one in five criminal and family barristers are considering joining alternative business structures (ABS) with non-lawyer owners, while four out of 10 of all barristers plan to apply, or are thinking of applying, for authorisation to conduct litigation, according to a major survey.

In a statistical snapshot that showed barristers struggling to cope with the impact of legal aid cuts in publicly-funded work, the biennial survey of the Bar 2013, Barristers’ working lives, found the earnings of two thirds of self-employed criminal barristers had fallen. More than half were not satisfied and were considering their options – with nearly a fifth intending to leave the profession altogether.

The survey was the second of its kind. The first biennial survey was published in February 2012.

Meanwhile, the survey revealed that the Bar Council’s BARCO escrow service – an initiative designed to assist direct access barristers to compete with solicitors – had a very low take up and poor brand recognition among barristers.

In a sign that direct access has a growing appeal to barristers, one in five barristers said they planned to take public access training in the next two years and another 21% thought they might. If the plans are carried through, almost half of the Bar will soon be qualified to deal directly with clients.

But ambitions to take advantage of new litigation rights were more limited. About one in seven barristers had firm plans to apply for authorisation to conduct litigation, and another quarter were considering it.

The barristers who responded to the survey showed a greater appetite for joining BSB-regulated entities – ABSs – that had only barrister owners and managers. A third of family barristers (34%) and a quarter of criminal barristers (26%) said they had “definite” or “possible” intentions to become involved in such an entity. However, 17% and 18% respectively were considering joining ABSs which included non-lawyer owners.

Overall, nearly three quarters of self-employed barristers said they would “do something in preparation for new ways of working”, such as “increasing their understanding of different ownership models”.

Making use of the Bar’s escrow service, BARCO, was not among steps many barristers planned to take. Just 2% intended to use it in the next six months, while 3% they would use a different escrow service. Meanwhile, one in three respondents did not know what BARCO was.

The effect of the LASPO cuts could be seen in a marked drop in the number of barristers employed in the public sector; from 66% in 2011 to 56% in 2013. Correspondingly, the proportion of barristers employed in solicitors’ firms increased from 13% to 22%.

In criminal practice, where 90% of employed barristers worked for the public sector in 2011, two years later the figure had fallen to 73%. Among self-employed criminal barristers, the survey found 67% said their earnings had fallen between 2011 and 2013. Nearly a fifth (18%) said they planned to leave the profession and a further 11% planned to leave criminal practice.

In terms of the diversity of the self-employed Bar, the survey showed that men continued to outnumber women by two to one. In the employed Bar the ratio was 50:50. The proportion of black and minority ethnic barristers was unchanged from 2011 at about one in 10.

The survey showed younger barristers were more likely to be Oxbridge educated, a trend reported by Legal Futures in November 2012. It said: “In recent years more new entrants to the Bar were educated at Oxford or Cambridge with 45 per cent of the Young Bar (new entrants 1-3 years) having attended Oxbridge, compared with 31 per cent across the remainder of the Bar.”

Across all barristers, 32% went to Oxbridge, 39% to Russell Group universities (for example Bristol, Edinburgh, Imperial, LSE, Kings), and 7% to ‘1994 Group’ universities (such as Bath, Durham, Exeter, York). Just 13% went to the old polytechnics.

The survey was sponsored by the Bar Standards Board (BSB) and the Bar Council. Some 3,276 barristers participated out of 7,406 who were invited. The response rate of 44% “demonstrates the Bar’s willingness to engage with its representative body”, said Nicholas Lavender QC, chairman of the Bar.

Surprisingly, 9% of barristers reported they had personally been bullied or harassed at work in the past two years and a similar proportion said they had experienced discrimination. Even more (11% and 9% respectively) said they had witnessed these behaviours in their workplace.

Commenting on the findings, Baroness Ruth Deech, the BSB’s chair, said: “An increase of this scale in the number of barristers people can access directly is good news for consumers as it would increase consumer choice and potentially bring their costs down. Allowing these barristers then to conduct litigation will help take the administrative burden off members of the public – who may lack the time and expertise to do this…

“Yet again, this important research provides invaluable insights into the profession and the detailed data captured here will be extremely useful in informing our work in the future.”

Mr Lavender said: “As some parts of the profession continue to go from strength to strength, other parts of the Bar, and in particular the publicly-funded Bar, have fared less well, with falling fee rates for all and for many less work than before. This issue significantly impacts the barristers’ experience in the profession and their willingness to recommend the Bar as a career.

“As a result of the Government’s cuts to legal aid, we should be concerned about what this means for the future of the profession, of the criminal, family and civil justice systems and of the public they serve.”


    Readers Comments

  • finola moss says:

    The government has destroyed the solicitor profession by conversion to manaeerialised ABS, commercially aware corporations. Largely unaccountable . Easily dissolved and reformed, if sued.

    Now it will be the same for our independent bar..

    Not by choice, but forced through no legal aid and civil cost cutting.

    This is the end of the independent legal profession, which allowed quality and enforcement of our laws by competition, between individual barristers and solicitors firms, personally liable for their work and reputation, replaced by large , impersonal profit hungry corporations.

    Even in America this has not been allowed to happen. This is the end of the law for the public. And the advent of establishment totalitarianism.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Will solicitors finally be fans of transparency now?

Since the introduction of the SRA’s transparency rules in December 2018, I have been an advocate for law firms going further then the regulatory essentials.

A two-point plan to halve the size of the SRA

I have joked for many years that you could halve the size (and therefore cost) of the Solicitors Regulation Authority overnight by banning both client account and sole practitioners.

Key cyber and data security questions to ask a legal IT provider

One of the growing priorities that law firms face when considering a legal technology provider is cyber and data security, such as their responsibilities and cyber incident management.

Loading animation