Barrister sets up BSB-regulated firm to work for City solicitors


jane walshe

Walshe: “the legal landscape is changing so much”

A barrister has set up a limited company, regulated by the Bar Standards Board (BSB), to work as a consultant for a leading City law firm.

Jane Walshe, a financial services and compliance specialist, said: “I was the first person to be authorised to work in this way, but I won’t be the last.

“If the BSB had rejected my application, I would have become a solicitor. The legal landscape is changing so much. It was about time the Bar caught up, and it has done.”

Since Berwin Leighton Paisner set up Lawyers on Demand in 2007, a number of City firms have followed suit under different brands, describing their lawyers as working freelance or as consultants.

Ms Walshe went on: “I can’t offer regulated services as a barrister and charge people via a limited company, without it becoming an authorised body. I wanted to work for the law firm as a business, and not as an employed barrister. It gives me more flexibility.”

Ms Walshe said all the solicitors working for her firm through flexible contracts operated through limited companies so “they could not later be accused of being an employee” of the firm.

“The firms themselves like people to work as limited companies, and it’s a standard resourcing model.”

Ms Walshe said being a limited company gave her greater control over tax and expenses. She is currently working for the law firm on a financial services project for four days a week, and as a compliance consultant, as director of Compass Compliance, for one day.

“This ensures there are clear divisions over the work I do as a lawyer and as a compliance consultant,” she said. “It keeps things nice and separate.”

The BSB, which predicted at one point last year that it would authorise 400 firms in 2015, approved only 32 in its first four months as an entity regulator, papers for July’s board meeting reported.

Tags:




    Readers Comments

  • Ian Beeby says:

    I am not surprised at the low numbers. My calculations suggest that unless you need to avoid mixing PAYE and self-employed earnings the higher costs of regulation are not offset by any tax advantages until earnings are quite high.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Change in regulator shouldn’t make AML less of a priority

While SRA fines for AML have been climbing, many in the profession aren’t confident they will get any relief from the FCA, a body used to dealing with a highly regulated industry.


There are 17 million wills waiting to be written

The main reason cited by people who do not have a will was a lack of awareness as to how to arrange one. As a professional community, we seem to be failing to get our message across.


The case for a single legal services regulator: why the current system is failing

From catastrophic firm collapses to endemic compliance failures, the evidence is mounting that the current multi-regulator model is fundamentally broken.


Loading animation